...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >HOW DO LEARNING DISORDERS IMPACT CLINICAL MEASURES FOLLOWING CONCUSSION?
【24h】

HOW DO LEARNING DISORDERS IMPACT CLINICAL MEASURES FOLLOWING CONCUSSION?

机译:学习障碍如何在脑震荡之后影响临床措施?

获取原文

摘要

Background: There is limited evidence examining the impact of learning disorders on testing and screening scores used in evaluation following concussion in adolescents. Purpose: To examine differences in clinical measures between adolescents with a history of dyslexia or ADD/ADHD and those without a history of learning disorder (LD) following concussion. Methods: Data were collected from participants enrolled in the North Texas Concussion Network Prospective Registry (ConTex). Participants ages 10-18 who had been diagnosed with a concussion sustained within 30 days of enrollment were included. Participants were separated into three groups based on self-reported prior diagnosis: dyslexia, ADD/ADHD, and no history of LD. Clinical measures from initial presentation were examined, including ImPACT ~(?), King-Devick (KD), SCAT-5 symptom log, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale. Independent t-test analysis was performed to compare scores between groups. Results: A total of 993 participants were included; 68 with dyslexia, 141 with ADD/ADHD, and 784 with no history of LD. There was no difference in age, sex, time since injury, or history of concussion between the dyslexia group and no LD group. In the ADD/ADHD group, there were significantly more male participants (64.5% and 50.3% respectively, p=0.002). Participants with a history of dyslexia had a significant increase in KD time (63.7 sec vs 56.5 sec, p=0.019). Additionally, ImPACT ~(?) testing showed a decrease in visual motor speed (28.87 vs 32.99, p= 0.010). Total symptom score was higher in this group as well (36.22 vs 28.27, p=0.013). In those with a history of ADD/ADHD, multiple domains were found to be significantly different on ImPACT ~(?) testing including visual motor speed (30.05), reaction time (0.75), and cognitive efficiency (0.23) when compared to those with no LD (32.99, 0.71, and 0.27 respectively, p=0.004, 0.047, 0.027). KD time was also significantly higher in this group (62.1 sec vs 56.5 sec, p=0.008), as was the total symptom score (32.99 vs 28.27, p=0.043). PHQ-8 and GAD-7 were both significantly higher in the group with ADD/ADHD (5.79 and 5.06 respectively, p=0.001) than those with no LD (4.32 and 3.56, p=0.001). Conclusion: Differences were seen in participants with a history of dyslexia and ADD/ADHD on clinical concussion measures, including ImPACT ~(?) and KD testing, SCAT-5 symptom log, and screenings for depression and anxiety. A better understanding of the unique profiles seen in these patients will aid providers in their evaluation and assist as they counsel families regarding their child’s injury.
机译:背景:证据有限的证据证明了学习障碍对在青少年震荡下的评估中使用的测试和筛选分数的影响。目的:检查具有诵读历史记录或添加/ adhd历史的青少年之间的临床措施的差异以及没有学习障碍历史(LD)之后的脑震荡。方法:从北德克萨斯州震荡网络前瞻性注册表(Contex)的参与者收集数据。包括10-18岁的参与者被诊断出呼吁在入学后30天内持续。根据自我报告的先前诊断,参与者分为三组:诵读障碍,加入/ adhd,没有LD的历史。研究了初步介绍的临床措施,包括影响〜(?),王凡士队(KD),SCAT-5症状日志,患者健康问卷(PHQ-8)和广义焦虑症(GAD-7)规模。进行独立的T检验分析以比较组之间的分数。结果:共有993名参与者; 68带有诵读,141带ADD / ADHD,784,没有LD历史。年龄,性别,自伤的时间没有差异,或障碍集团之间的脑震荡历史,没有LD集团。在ADD / ADHD组中,有更多的男性参与者(分别为64.5%和50.3%,p = 0.002)。患有诵读历史的参与者在KD时间内显着增加(63.7秒VS 56.5秒,P = 0.019)。此外,影响〜(α)测试显示视觉电机速度的降低(28.87 Vs 32.99,P = 0.010)。本组的总症状评分较高(36.22 Vs 28.27,P = 0.013)。在添加/ ADHD历史的人中,发现多个域在与那些相比的影响(30.05),反应时间(0.75)和认知效率(0.23)时显着不同分别没有LD(32.99,0.71和0.27,P = 0.004,0.047,0.027)。该组KD时间也明显高(62.1秒VS 56.5秒,P = 0.008),症状分数总数(32.99 VS 28.27,P = 0.043)。 PHQ-8和GAD-7在组中的添加/ ADHD(分别为5.79和5.06分别,P = 0.001)显着高于NO LD(4.32和3.56,P = 0.001)。结论:参与者在临床脑震荡措施中的历史记录和ADHD历史中观察到差异,包括影响〜(?)和KD测试,SCAT-5症状日志和抑郁和焦虑的筛查。更好地了解这些患者中所见的独特型材将帮助提供者评估,并协助他们律师的家庭受伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号