...
首页> 外文期刊>Museum and Society >“Deterritorializing the Canadian Museum for Human Rights”
【24h】

“Deterritorializing the Canadian Museum for Human Rights”

机译:“摧毁加拿大人权博物馆”

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article explains the value of assemblage theory to making sense of a museum like the Canadian Museum for Human Rights (CMHR), which has struggled with the formidable challenge of comparatively representing human rights in controversial cultural and historical contexts. I argue that “assemblage thinking” permits us to appreciate more richly the way in which the expressive power of the CMHR arises from the dynamic interaction/intersection of overlapping clusters of objects, spaces, ideologies, memories, feelings, structures, histories, and experiences. Understood as “assemblages,” these clusters in important (but not all) ways lie beyond the scope of formal agency such as that exercised by curators and museum administrators. Accordingly, we must understand museums generally, and the CMHR particularly, as fundamentally unable guarantee the integrity and perdurability of their/its own structures and meanings, and recognize these meanings (and a museum’s identity) as irreducibly open-ended and provisional.
机译:本文阐述了大会理论的价值,以了解加拿大人权博物馆(CMHR)等博物馆的意义,这与争议文化和历史背景下的人权相比,这一点争夺了争议。我认为“组合思想”允许我们更加丰富地升值,其中CMHR的表现力来自对象,空间,意识形态,记忆,感受,结构,历史,历史,体验和经验的重叠集群的动态相互作用/交叉点。理解为“组合”,这些集群在重要的(但不是全部)方式围绕正式机构的范围,例如由策展人和博物馆管理人员行使。因此,我们必须一般地理解博物馆,特别是CMHR,特别是根本无法保证其自己的结构和含义的完整性和默许性,并认识到这些含义(以及博物馆的身份),因为不可挽回的开放式和临时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号