首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >Interiors, Affect, and Use: How Does an Academic Library’s Learning Commons Support Students’ Needs?
【24h】

Interiors, Affect, and Use: How Does an Academic Library’s Learning Commons Support Students’ Needs?

机译:室内设计,影响和使用:学术图书馆的学习共享如何支持学生的需求?

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective – This study sought to identify the learning needs, satisfaction levels, and preferences of students using an academic library’s learning commons. A particular focus was understanding whether the socio-collaborative environment facilitated by the learning commons was aligned with the institutional objectives of supporting intensive study and scholarly work. Methods – A mixed methods sequential explanatory study design was used, in which quantitative findings were supplemented by qualitative findings. Data for the study were drawn from 59 hours of observations documenting behaviors of 9,249 individuals, as well as survey responses from 302 students. Three semi-structured focus groups with 10 students were held to discuss and clarify findings. Results – Behavior mapping and survey data showed that students were largely satisfied with the learning commons and that it was considered a supportive environment for them to complete their stated tasks. Incongruity was observed between the learning commons’ intended and actual use; although 75% of spaces were designated for collaboration, 50% of survey respondents identified independent work as their primary task and 76% of individuals were observed working independently. In focus group discussions, students praised the space for its vibrant ambiance and facilitation of social connections, but acknowledged that more serious study required retreat into quieter spaces found elsewhere in the library. Conclusion – The learning commons is an important and desirable space for students, providing a safe and community-oriented environment that is located in the center of campus. While students deemed the atmosphere successful for fostering social relationships and creating an overall sense of belonging, care needs to be taken to maintain a proper balance between quiet and collaborative spaces. The methods used in this study underscore the importance of gathering data from multiple sources, offering guidance to other libraries seeking to create, re-envision, and assess their learning spaces.
机译:目标 - 本研究寻求使用学术图书馆的学习共享学生的学习需求,满意度和偏好。特定的重点是了解学习共同促进的社会协作环境是否与支持密集学习和学术工作的制度目标保持一致。方法 - 使用顺序解释性研究设计的混合方法,其中通过定性发现补充了定量发现。该研究的数据从59小时的观察结果中汲取了9,249人的行为,以及来自302名学生的调查答复。三个半结构化焦点小组举行了10名学生讨论和澄清调查结果。结果 - 行为映射和调查数据显示,学生对学习的公共声称很满意,并且被认为是他们完成所说的任务的支持性环境。在学习的公共场合和实际使用之间观察到不协调;虽然75%的空间被指定为合作,但50%的调查受访者确定了独立的工作,因为他们的主要任务和76%的人被遵守独立工作。在焦点小组讨论中,学生称赞了其充满活力的氛围和促进社会联系的空间,但承认更严肃的研究需要撤退到图书馆其他地方的更安静的空间。结论 - 学习共享是学生的重要和理想的空间,提供位于校园中心的安全和社区导向的环境。虽然学生认为大气成功地培养了社会关系并创造了整体的归属感,但需要注意保持安静和协作空间之间的适当平衡。本研究中使用的方法强调了从多个来源收集数据的重要性,向寻求创建,重新设想和评估其学习空间的其他图书馆提供指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号