首页> 外文期刊>Infectious Diseases and Therapy >Cefazolin Versus Anti-Staphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infection: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
【24h】

Cefazolin Versus Anti-Staphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infection: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

机译:Cefazolin与抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗甲氧西林易感葡萄球菌感染的患者:试验顺序分析的META分析

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionMethicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is a common cause of infection in humans. Beta-lactam antibiotics are the preferred agents, with anti-staphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) or the first-generation cephalosporin, cefazolin, favored by clinicians. Recent studies comparing the two strategies suggest similar outcomes between the agents. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore differences between cefazolin and ASPs for the treatment of MSSA infections. MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) of observational or cohort studies using a random-effects model. Two blinded reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, risk of bias, and data extraction. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical failure, infection recurrence, and antibiotic discontinuation due to adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary outcome by type of ASP, studies with a high percentage of deep-seated infections, and studies of low to moderate risk of bias. ResultsAfter performing a comprehensive search of the literature, and screening for study inclusion, 19 studies (13,390 patients) were included in the final meta-analysis. Fifteen of the 19 studies (79%) were judged as having a low or moderate risk of bias. Use of cefazolin was associated with lower all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56–0.91, p =?0.006, I sup2/sup?=?28%], clinical failure (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41–0.74, p 2/sup?=?0%), and antibiotic discontinuation due to adverse events (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16–0.39, p 2/sup?=?23%). Infection recurrence was higher in the cefazolin patients (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.04–1.93, p =?0.03, I sup2/sup?=?0%). ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of cefazolin was associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality, clinical failure, and discontinuation due to adverse events, but was associated with an increased risk of infection recurrence. FundingUniversity of Florida Open Access Publishing Fund funded the Rapid Service Fees. Trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (study ID: CRD42018106442).
机译:引入甲基胆肽易感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)是人类感染的常见原因。 β-内酰胺抗生素是优选的药剂,含有抗葡萄球菌青霉素(ASP)或第一代头孢菌素,Cefazolin,由临床医生青睐。最近的研究比较了两种策略表明了代理商之间的类似结果。该荟萃分析的目的是探讨Cefazolin和ASP之间的差异,用于治疗MSSA感染。方法网络使用随机效应模型对观察或队列研究的试验顺序分析(TSA)进行了META分析。两个盲化审查员独立评估了纳入,偏倚风险和数据提取的研究。主要结果是全部导致死亡率。二次结果包括由于不良事件导致的临床失败,感染复发和抗生素停止。通过ASP类型进行亚组分析进行初级结果,具有高百分比的深层感染的研究,以及低至适度偏倚风险的研究。结果表现出对文献的全面搜索,并筛选研究包容,19项研究(13,390名患者)纳入最终的Meta分析。 19项研究中的十五项(79%)被判断为具有低或中等偏倚的风险。使用Cefazolin与较低的全导致死亡率有关[差距(或)0.71,95%置信区间(CI)0.56-0.91,P = 0.006,I 2 ?=?28%] ,临床失败(或0.55,95%CI 0.41-0.74,p 2 Δ= 0%),并且由于不良事件(或0.25,95%CI 0.16-0.39,P 2 ?=?23%)。头孢唑啉患者(或1.41,95%CI 1.04-1.93,P = 0.03,I 2 ?=Δ0%)感染复发较高。结论荟萃分析表明,由于不良事件,CeFazolin的使用与所有原因死亡率,临床失败和停药的显着降低有关,但与感染复发的风险增加有关。佛罗里达开放式出版基金的投资大学资助了快速服务费。试验登录普罗斯普罗国际临时注册系统评价(研究ID:CRD42018106442)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号