...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases >Cefazolin versus anti-staphylococcal penicillins for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a narrative review
【24h】

Cefazolin versus anti-staphylococcal penicillins for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a narrative review

机译:Cefazolin与抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗甲氧西林 - 易感葡萄球菌(Aureus)菌血症:叙事审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Anti-staphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) are recommended as first-line agents in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia. Concerns about their safety profile have contributed to the increased use of cefazolin. The comparative clinical effectiveness and safety profile of cefazolin versus ASPs for such infections remain unclear. Furthermore, uncertainty persists concerning the use of cefazolin due to controversies over its efficacy in deep MSSA infections and its possible negative ecological impact.
机译:背景:抗葡萄球菌青霉素(ASPS)被推荐为甲氧西林易感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌血症中的一线剂。 对他们的安全型材的担忧有助于增加了Cefazolin的使用。 Cefazolin对ASP的比较临床效果和安全性概况,这种感染仍然尚不清楚。 此外,由于在深MSSA感染的疗效和可能的负面生态冲击中,由于对其疗效的争论以及可能的负面生态冲击而导致的使用Cefazolin的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号