首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >What makes an online problem-based group successful? A learning analytics study using social network analysis
【24h】

What makes an online problem-based group successful? A learning analytics study using social network analysis

机译:是什么让基于在线问题的团体成功?利用社会网络分析学习分析研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Although there is a wealth of research focusing on PBL, most studies employ self-reports, surveys, and interviews as data collection methods and have an exclusive focus on students. There is little research that has studied interactivity in online PBL settings through the lens of Social Network Analysis (SNA) to explore both student and teacher factors that could help monitor and possibly proactively support PBL groups. This study adopts SNA to investigate how groups, tutors and individual student’s interactivity variables correlate with group performance and whether the interactivity variables could be used to predict group performance. We do so by analyzing 60 groups’ work in 12 courses in dental education (598 students). The interaction data were extracted from a Moodle-based online learning platform to construct the aggregate networks of each group. SNA variables were calculated at the group level, students’ level and tutor’s level. We then performed correlation tests and multiple regression analysis using SNA measures and performance data. The findings demonstrate that certain interaction variables are indicative of a well-performing group; particularly the quantity of interactions, active and reciprocal interactions among students, and group cohesion measures (transitivity and reciprocity). A more dominating role for teachers may be a negative sign of group performance. Finally, a stepwise multiple regression test demonstrated that SNA centrality measures could be used to predict group performance. A significant equation was found, F (4, 55)?=?49.1, p??0.01, with an R2 of 0.76. Tutor Eigen centrality, user count, and centralization outdegree were all statistically significant and negative. However, reciprocity in the group was a positive predictor of group improvement. The findings of this study emphasized the importance of interactions, equal participation and inclusion of all group members, and reciprocity and group cohesion as predictors of a functioning group. Furthermore, SNA could be used to monitor online PBL groups, identify important quantitative data that helps predict and potentially support groups to function and co-regulate, which would improve the outcome of interacting groups in PBL. The information offered by SNA requires relatively little effort to analyze and could help educators get valuable insights about their groups and individual collaborators.
机译:虽然有丰富的研究专注于PBL,但大多数研究都采用了自我报告,调查和访谈作为数据收集方法,并对学生提供专用的专注。几乎没有研究通过社交网络分析(SNA)镜头研究了在线PBL设置的交互性,以探索可以帮助监测和可能主动支持PBL组的学生和教师因素。本研究采用SNA来调查组,导师和个别学生的交互变量如何与组性能相关,以及相互作用变量是否可用于预测组性能。我们通过分析60个课程在牙科教育中的60个课程(598名学生)的工作。互动数据从基于Moodle的在线学习平台中提取,以构造每个组的聚合网络。 SNA变量在组级,学生的水平和导师水平计算。然后,我们使用SNA测量和性能数据进行相关测试和多元回归分析。调查结果表明,某些相互作用变量表示良好的群体;特别是学生的相互作用,活性和相互作用的数量,以及组内凝视措施(转运和互惠)。教师的统治作用可能是小组绩效的负迹象。最后,逐步多元回归测试表明,SNA中心度量可用于预测组性能。发现了一个重要的等式,f(4,55)?=α49.1,p?<β01,R2为0.76。导师EIGEN中心,用户数和集中化持续的是统计上显着和消极。然而,本集团的互惠是群体改善的积极预测因子。本研究的结果强调了相互作用,平等参与和纳入所有小组成员的重要性,以及互惠和组凝聚力作为运作组的预测因素。此外,SNA可用于监测在线PBL基团,确定重要的定量数据,有助于预测和潜在地支持组的功能和共调节,这将改善PBL中的相互作用群体的结果。 SNA提供的信息需要对分析的努力相对较少,并且可以帮助教育工作者对其团体和个人合作者获得有价值的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号