首页> 外文期刊>BMC Urology >Cost comparison between open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review of segmental costs
【24h】

Cost comparison between open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review of segmental costs

机译:膀胱癌患者开放自由基膀胱切除术,腹腔镜自由基膀胱切除术和机器人辅助自由基膀胱切除术的成本比较:对节段成本的系统综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is becoming a common treatment for bladder carcinoma. However, in comparison with open radical cystectomy, its cost-effectiveness has not been confirmed. Although few published reviews have compared total costs between the two surgical procedures, no study has compared segmental costs and explained their impact on total costs. A systematic review was conducted based on studies on the segmental costs of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to provide insight into cost-effective management methods for radical cystectomy. The segmental costs included operating, robot-related, complication, and length of stay costs. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the impact of the annual number of cases on the per-case robot-related costs. We identified two studies that compared open and laparoscopic surgeries and nine that compared open and robotic surgeries. Open radical cystectomy costs were higher than those of robotic surgeries in two retrospective single-institution studies, while robot-assisted radical cystectomy costs were higher in 1 retrospective single-institution study, 1 randomized controlled trial, and 4 large database studies. Operating costs were higher for robotic surgery, and accounted for 63.1–70.5% of the total robotic surgery cost. Sensitivity analysis revealed that robot-related costs were not a large proportion of total surgery costs in institutions with a large number of cases but accounted for a large proportion of total costs in centers with a small number of cases. The results show that robot-assisted radical cystectomy is more expensive than open radical cystectomy. The most effective methods to decrease costs associated with robotic surgery include a decrease in operating time and an increase in the number of cases. Further research is required on the cost-effectiveness of surgeries, including quality measures such as quality of life and quality-adjusted life years.
机译:机器人辅助的自由基膀胱切除术正在成为膀胱癌的常见处理。然而,与开放自由基膀胱切除术相比,其成本效益尚未得到证实。虽然很少有发布的审查比较了两种外科手术之间的总成本,但没有研究比较节段成本并解释了他们对总成本的影响。根据使用PubMed,Science,Cochrane图书馆数据库进行开放,腹腔镜和机器人和机器人辅助自由基膀胱切除术的分段成本进行的系统审查,以便为激进膀胱切除术提供经济高效的管理方法的洞察力。分段成本包括运营,机器人相关,复杂性和保持费用。进行了敏感性分析,以确定年度案件数量对案例机器人相关费用的影响。我们确定了两项研究,比较了开放和腹腔镜手术和九个相比的开放和机器人手术。开放的自由基膀胱切除术成本高于两个回顾性单机构研究中的机器人手术的成本,而1回顾性单机制研究,1个随机对照试验和4种大型数据库研究,机器人辅助自由基膀胱切除术成本较高。机器人手术的运营成本较高,占机器人手术成本的63.1-70.5%。敏感性分析显示,有关机器人相关的成本在大量案件中的机构中的总手术成本并不大,但占少数案件中心的总费用比例。结果表明,机器人辅助的自由基膀胱切除术比开放式膀胱切除术更昂贵。减少与机器人手术相关的成本的最有效方法包括减少操作时间和病例数量的增加。需要进一步的研究,包括手术的成本效益,包括质量措施,如生活质量和质量调整的生活年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号