首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >What Would Jaws Do? The tyranny of film and the relationship between gaze and higher-level comprehension processes for narrative film.
【24h】

What Would Jaws Do? The tyranny of film and the relationship between gaze and higher-level comprehension processes for narrative film.

机译:下颌会做什么?电影的专制以及注视与叙事电影的更高层次理解过程之间的关系。

获取原文
       

摘要

What is the relationship between viewers' eye movements while watching a film and their comprehension of it? Most Hollywood movies can be considered "tyrannical" because they induce most viewers to look at the same things at the same timea??hereafter, "attentional synchrony." But does this indicate that viewers also understand the movie similarly? To investigate this question, we manipulated the presence/absence of prior film context and measured resulting differences in film comprehension and eye movements. Viewers watched a 12-second James Bond movie clip, ending just as a critical predictive inference should be drawn that Bond's nemesis, "Jaws" would fall from the sky onto a circus tent. This was engendered by the filmmakers' use of cross-cutting between shots of Jaws falling through the air and shots of a circus tent. The No-context condition saw only the 12-second clip, but the Context condition also saw the preceding 2.5 minutes of the movie, thus providing them with a mental model of the prior narrative context before seeing the critical 12-second portion of the clip. Overall, there was strong attentional synchrony for all viewers in both viewing conditions. However, the No-context viewers were significantly less likely to draw the critical inference (i.e., less understanding), were more likely to consider the first shot of the circus tent to be a new event (i.e., less perceived coherence across cross-cut shots), showed less attentional synchrony during the first circus tent shot (i.e., a greater need to explore the scene) and had a greater probability of fixation on the first circus tent shot (i.e., greater processing difficulty). Thus, despite Hollywood films' "tyrannical" control of viewers' attention, viewers' subtle eye movement differences can indicate important comprehension differences. These results point to the need for a theory encompassing processes involved from the perception to the comprehension of a film.
机译:观众在观看电影时的眼动与其理解之间的关系是什么?大多数好莱坞电影可以被认为是“暴虐的”,因为它们诱使大多数观众在同一时间观看相同的事物,以下称为“注意同步”。但这是否表明观众也同样了解电影?为了研究这个问题,我们操纵了先前电影背景的存在/不存在,并测量了电影理解和眼球运动的结果差异。观众观看了12秒钟的詹姆斯·邦德(James Bond)电影剪辑,结束时就得出了关键的预测性推论,即邦德的克星“大颚”将从天上掉落到马戏团的帐篷上。这是由于电影制片人在空中飞过的大颚镜头和马戏团帐篷的镜头之间使用横切镜头而产生的。 “无上下文”条件仅看到了12秒的剪辑,但是“上下文”条件也看到了电影的前2.5分钟,因此在观看剪辑的关键12秒部分之前,为他们提供了先前叙述上下文的心理模型。 。总体而言,在两种观看条件下,所有观看者的注意力同步性都很高。但是,无关联观看者不太可能得出批判性推断(即,缺乏理解),更有可能将马戏团帐篷的第一枪视为新事件(即,跨切面的感知连贯性较低)镜头)在第一个马戏团帐篷射击期间的注意力同步性较低(即,对场景的需求更大),并且固定在第一个马戏团帐篷射击中的可能性较大(即,处理难度更大)。因此,尽管好莱坞电影对观众的注意力进行了“暴虐”的控制,但观众微妙的眼动差异仍可以说明重要的理解差异。这些结果表明,需要一种涵盖从电影的感知到理解的过程的理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号