首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Loss of efficacy and safety of the switch from infliximab original to infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
【24h】

Loss of efficacy and safety of the switch from infliximab original to infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

机译:在炎症性肠病患者中从原来的英夫利昔单抗改用英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药(CT-P13)的疗效和安全性丧失

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Infliximab original has changed the natural history of in?ammatory bowel diseases (IBD) over the past two decades. However, the recent expiration of its patent has allowed the entry of the first Infliximab biosimilar into the European and Spanish markets. Currently switching drugs data in IBD are limited. AIM To compare the efficacy of infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13, against infliximab original, analyzing the loss of response of both at the 12 mo follow-up in patients with IBD. METHODS An observational study of two cohorts has been conducted. One retrospective cohort that included patients with IBD treated with Infliximab original, and a prospective cohort of patients who were switching from infliximab original to infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13). We had analyzed the overall efficacy and loss of efficacy in patients in remission at the end of one year after treatment with the original drug compared to the results of the year of treatment with the biosimilar. RESULTS 98 patients (CD 67, CU 31) were included in both cohorts. The overall efficacy for infliximab original per year of treatment was 71% vs 68.2% for infliximab biosimilar ( P = 0.80). The loss of overall efficacy at 12 mo for infliximab original was 6.6% vs 14.5% for infliximab biosimilar ( P = 0.806). The loss of efficacy in patients who were in basal remission was 16.3% for infliximab original vs 27.1% for infliximab biosimilar. Adverse events were 9.2% for infliximab original vs 11.2% for infliximab biosimilar. CONCLUSION The overall efficacy and loss of treatment response with infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13) is similar to that observed with infliximab original in patients who were switching at the 12 mo follow-up. There is no difference in the rate of adverse events.
机译:背景技术在过去的二十年中,原来的英夫利昔单抗改变了炎症性肠病(IBD)的自然史。但是,其专利的最近期满已允许首个英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药进入欧洲和西班牙市场。当前在IBD中切换毒品数据是有限的。目的比较英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药CT-P13与英夫利昔单抗的疗效,分析IBD患者在随访12个月时两者的反应丧失。方法对两个队列进行了观察性研究。一项回顾性队列研究包括接受Infliximab原始治疗的IBD患者,以及从原来Infliximab改用Infliximab生物仿制药(CT-P13)的患者的前瞻性队列。与生物仿制药治疗当年的结果相比,我们分析了原始药物治疗后一年结束时缓解期患者的总体疗效和疗效下降。结果两组均纳入98例患者(CD 67,CU 31)。最初使用英夫利昔单抗治疗的总体疗效为71%,而英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药的总体疗效为68.2%(P = 0.80)。最初使用英夫利昔单抗的患者在12个月时的整体疗效损失为6.6%,而英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药的总疗效损失为14.5%(P = 0.806)。最初使用英夫利昔单抗的患者在基底缓解患者中的功效损失为16.3%,而英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药为27.1%。最初使用英夫利昔单抗的不良事件为9.2%,而英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药的不良事件为11.2%。结论英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药(CT-P13)的总体疗效和治疗反应丧失与在12 mo随访时转用英夫利昔单抗的患者相似。不良事件发生率没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号