...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Synchronous and Asynchronous e-learning Styles and Academic Performance of e-learners
【24h】

Synchronous and Asynchronous e-learning Styles and Academic Performance of e-learners

机译:同步和异步电子学习风格与电子学习者的学习成绩

获取原文

摘要

It is important to keep in mind that every individual is a unique learner. Educators have, for many years, realized that some learners prefer certain methods of learning. These methods, referred as learning preferences or learning styles. This study was aimed to ascertain the learning styles of students in mode of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning and to compare the learning styles of e-learners with their academic performance. Synchronous or asynchronies e-learner determiner test and the Kolb's Learning Styles Inventory (KLSI 3.1) were conducted to identify differences in the learning styles among 731 e-learners from six virtual universities which were confined in Tehran and categorized in three different academic performance groups including low, mediocre and high. The sample was selected by multi-stage sampling based on Cochran formula and researchers conducted Kruskal-Wallis test to assess whether there is any significant difference within synchronous and asynchronous e-learners’ learning styles based on their academic performance groups. The results revealed that in synchronous e-learners while, synchronous e-learners in low, mediocre and high academic performance groups preferred Assimilating and Diverging styles. In contrast, the results demonstrated that asynchronous e-learners in low, mediocre and high academic performance groups preferred Assimilating and Converging styles. Researchers conducted Mann-Whitney U as Post Hoc and their effect size value was calculated for significant Post hoc tests.
机译:重要的是要记住,每个人都是独特的学习者。多年来,教育者已经意识到一些学习者更喜欢某些学习方法。这些方法称为学习偏好或学习方式。这项研究旨在确定学生在同步和异步电子学习模式下的学习方式,并将电子学习者的学习方式与其学习成绩进行比较。进行了同步或异步电子学习器确定器测试以及Kolb的学习风格量表(KLSI 3.1),以识别来自六所虚拟大学的731名电子学习者的学习风格差异,这些虚拟大学限于德黑兰并分为三个不同的学术表现组,其中包括低,平庸和高。通过基于Cochran公式的多阶段抽样选择了样本,研究人员进行了Kruskal-Wallis测试,以根据他们的学习表现组评估同步和异步电子学习者的学习风格是否存在显着差异。结果表明,在同步电子学习者中,处于低,中等和高学术表现水平的小组中的同步电子学习者更喜欢同化和发散风格。相反,结果表明,处于低,中等和高学术表现水平的异步电子学习者更喜欢同化和融合风格。研究人员将Mann-Whitney U作为Post Hoc进行了研究,并计算了他们的效应大小值用于重大Post hoc测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号