首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Formalising the Informal? – Finding a Balance between Formal Teams and Communities of Practice in a Project-based Organisation
【24h】

Formalising the Informal? – Finding a Balance between Formal Teams and Communities of Practice in a Project-based Organisation

机译:正式化非正式? –在基于项目的组织中的正式团队和实践社区之间找到平衡

获取原文
           

摘要

There are several issues and challenges related to forming and implementing knowledge management initiatives in project-based organisations in such a way to promote knowledge sharing, learning, innovation, organisation development. One such issue is to identify proper organisational structure(s) that can support and facilitate learning and development. There are 2 commonly used organisational structures. They are formal work-teams and (informal) communities of practice (CoP). Organisations, in general, have and/or need both the formal and informal structures. The challenge that several organizations have is how to combine formal work-teams and CoP – How to find a balance between them?This paper will look at a Scandinavian project-based organisation, and describe what this organisation has done in order to accomplish the balance. In this regard, the paper will focus on how the organisation deals with its organisational structure in such a way to facilitate learning and knowledge sharing; how it utilizes both formal teams and CoP in this process, and the challenges and opportunities that are associated with this process.This paper is based on the study whose objective was to see how a Scandinavian project-based organisation transformed itself into a double-knit organisation – effectively using both formal and informal structures to improve its work-performance. The study used a qualitative research method; a case study that incorporated interviews (semi-structures interviews), observations and document analysis. At the start of the study, the organisation was transforming its ‘below the radar’ CoP into recognised structures within the organisation. Hence, the situation offered an opportunity to study the actual transition process.Findings of the study discuss among other things, the organisation's formalization of (previously informal) team leadership positions, incorporating members of CoP in the advisory board and leadership roles, and formalising CoP, while at the same time strengthening formal structures such as formal teams. The organisation used social settings to encourage interaction among employees. The major findings were that for double-knit organisation to effectively work, there is a need to balance organic, informal settings (CoP) and formal teams. The study confirmed previous findings that tacit knowledge plays a very significant role in knowledge transfer in project-based organisations. The study also showed that while formal teams were easier to create and define scope for them, the same could not be said about CoP. CoP were unpredictable and seemed to work better independent of the organisational leaders’ interference. However, they were promoted by employee interactions.As practical implications, the findings presented in this paper can be considered as suggestions – or, at least as focal points for reflection – for other project-based organisations to strengthen their knowledge management practices in order to obtain better results.
机译:在基于项目的组织中,以促进知识共享,学习,创新,组织发展的方式来制定和实施知识管理计划,存在许多问题和挑战。这样的问题之一是确定可以支持和促进学习与发展的适当组织结构。有2种常用的组织结构。他们是正式的工作团队和(非正式)实践社区(CoP)。通常,组织具有和/或需要正式和非正式结构。几个组织所面临的挑战是如何将正式的工作团队与CoP相结合–如何在两者之间找到平衡?本文将着眼于斯堪的纳维亚基于项目的组织,并描述该组织为实现平衡所进行的工作。在这方面,本文将重点讨论组织如何以促进学习和知识共享的方式处理组织结构。在此过程中,它如何利用正式团队和CoP,以及与此过程相关的挑战和机遇。本文基于这项研究,其目的是了解斯堪的纳维亚基于项目的组织如何将自身转变为双重联系组织–有效地使用正式和非正式结构来改善其工作绩效。该研究采用了定性研究方法。结合访谈(半结构访谈),观察和文档分析的案例研究。在研究开始时,该组织正在将其“雷达之下”的CoP转变为组织内公认的组织。因此,该情况为研究实际的过渡过程提供了机会。研究结果除其他事项外还讨论了组织对(以前是非正式的)团队领导职位的正式化,将CoP成员纳入顾问委员会和领导角色以及对CoP进行正式化,同时加强正式团队等正式结构。该组织使用社交环境来鼓励员工之间的互动。主要发现是,为了使双层针织组织有效工作,有必要在有机,非正式环境(CoP)和正式团队之间取得平衡。该研究证实了先前的发现,即隐性知识在基于项目的组织中的知识转移中起着非常重要的作用。该研究还表明,尽管正式团队更容易为他们创建和定义范围,但对于CoP却不能这么说。 CoP不可预测,并且似乎不受组织领导者的干预而更好地工作。但是,这些建议是通过员工互动促进的。作为实际意义,本文中提出的发现可以视为建议-或至少是反思的重点-对于其他基于项目的组织,以增强其知识管理实践,以便获得更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号