...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Effects of Using Rubrics in a University Academic Level Romanian Literature Class
【24h】

Effects of Using Rubrics in a University Academic Level Romanian Literature Class

机译:在大学学术水平的罗马尼亚文学班中使用专栏的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of rubrics in an academic level university Romanian Literature class. This class was run in a hybrid system, combining face-to-face meetings with online written assignments. Students completed two equivalent assignments, one without the use of a rubric and the second assignment using a rubric. Each assignment was scored using the rubric. For the first assignment (see Appendix A: First Assignment) the students were given a written assignment in which they were asked to develop a creative essay in which they took the role of one character in a story and wrote a letter describing their feelings about another character. In the second assignment the students wrote an essay explaining their thoughts in relation to the creative process. For the second creative essay (see Appendix B: Second Assignment) the students were given a rubric (see Appendix E: Writing Rubric) to assist them in the development for their essay. Thirty- five second year students from a blended weekend program agreed to participate in this study. Participants also completed a post class survey (see Appendix C: Student Rubric Survey) in relation to their thoughts about using rubrics to complete their assignments. The data revealed that the class mean score rose 4.8 grade points using the rubrics. For the 56.7% of the students whose scores were raised when they used the rubrics the average increase in scores was 11.1 percentage points. The study indicated that there are two groups of students: those who functioned better using the rubrics (56.7%) and those who functioned as well as or better when using no rubrics (43.3%).
机译:这项研究的目的是确定在学术级大学罗马尼亚文学班上,专栏的有效性。该课程在混合系统中运行,将面对面会议与在线书面作业结合在一起。学生完成了两个相等的作业,一个不使用专栏,第二个任务使用专栏。每个作业均使用评分法评分。对于第一次作业(请参阅附录A:第一次作业),学生将获得书面作业,要求他们撰写创意论文,在故事中扮演一个角色,并写信描述他们对另一个角色的感受字符。在第二个作业中,学生写了一篇文章,解释了他们与创作过程有关的想法。对于第二篇创意论文(请参阅附录B:第二作业),给学生提供了一个标题(请参阅附录E:写作主题),以帮助他们撰写论文。来自混合周末课程的35名二年级学生同意参加这项研究。参与者还完成了课后调查(请参阅附录C:学生专栏调查),以了解他们对使用专栏完成作业的想法。数据显示,使用评分标准,班级平均得分提高了4.8级。 56.7%的学生在使用评分标准时得分提高了,平均得分提高了11.1个百分点。研究表明,有两类学生:使用红字的学生表现更好(56.7%)和不使用红字的学生表现更好或更好(43.3%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号