首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Verbal Fluency Tasks: Does Time Matter for Identification of Executive Functioning and Lexical-Semantic Deficits Following Right Brain Damage?
【24h】

Verbal Fluency Tasks: Does Time Matter for Identification of Executive Functioning and Lexical-Semantic Deficits Following Right Brain Damage?

机译:语言流利性任务:识别右脑损伤后执行功能和词汇语义缺陷的时间是否重要?

获取原文
           

摘要

Verbal fluency tasks are one of the most widely used tools to assess verbal components of executive functions (Kavé, Heled, Vakil, & Agranov, 2010). This paradigm is classically applied in one minute trials, but versions with a larger time interval have been developed in order to increase their sensitivity to the identification of deficits, such as the tasks ?rom Protocole Montréal devaluation de la Communication {Protocole MEC^ Joanette, Ska, & C?té, 2004). Nevertheless, as far as we know, there are no studies that investigate the possible differences in sensitivity to deficits between brief and extended versions. The aim of the study was to verify if there are differences in sensitivity between these two forms of evaluation in a sample of right-brain-damaged individuals.
机译:语言流利度任务是评估执行功能的语言成分的最广泛使用的工具之一(Kavé,Heled,Vakil和Agranov,2010年)。这种范例通常在一分钟的试验中使用,但是已经开发了具有较大时间间隔的版本,以提高其对缺陷识别的敏感性,例如《蒙特利尔协议贬值》(Protocole MEC ^ Joanette, Ska&C?té,2004年)。然而,据我们所知,尚无研究调查简短版本和扩展版本之间对缺陷敏感性的可能差异。该研究的目的是验证在右脑受损个体的样本中,这两种评估形式之间的敏感性是否存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号