...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >An experimental study on the vocabulary level and vocabulary consolidation strategies
【24h】

An experimental study on the vocabulary level and vocabulary consolidation strategies

机译:词汇水平和词汇整合策略的实验研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of the research is to determine the effects of “Vocabulary Consolidation Strategy Training” on vocabulary learning, and the use of Vocabulary Consolidation strategies. The population of this study was the 34 students (12 female, 22 male) from a, university preparatory class in the Spring Term of the 2009-2010 Academic Year. The research presented in this study was based, on a randomized pretest posttest control group design., In this research, “Vocabulary Level Test” based on Paul Nation's Vocabulary Levels Tests (Nation, 1990) and “Vocabulary, Consolidation Strategy Inventory” adapted from Fan (2003); Schmitt (1997); Gu and Johnson (1996) were used. In the analysis, of the data, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, percentage, and t-Test techniques were used, and KR 20 reliability test was, administered for the Vocabulary Consolidation Strategy Scale. The significance level of the tests was .05.As a result of the research, there were statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups in favor of, the experimental group at the vocabulary levels 1000B, and 2000, but there was not any statistically significant difference between the groups at vocabulary level 1000A.
机译:研究的目的是确定“词汇整合策略培训”对词汇学习的影响以及词汇整合策略的使用。这项研究的人群是2009-2010学年春季学期的大学预科班的34名学生(12名女性,22名男性)。本研究提出的研究基于随机的前测后测试对照组设计。在本研究中,基于Paul Nation的词汇水平测验(国家,1990年)和“词汇,合并策略量表”改编的“词汇量测验”范(2003);施密特(1997);使用了Gu and Johnson(1996)。在数据分析中,使用了算术平均值,标准偏差,百分比和t检验技术,并针对“词汇合并策略量表”进行了KR 20可靠性测试。测试的显着性水平为0.05。根据研究结果,实验组和对照组之间的统计学差异有统计学意义,而词汇水平为1000B和2000的实验组却没有统计学意义词汇级别1000A的组之间存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号