首页> 外文期刊>Molecules >Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Crude Oil from Winter Melon (Benincasa hispida) Seed Using Response Surface Methodology and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant Activity, Total Phenolic Content and Fatty Acid Composition
【24h】

Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Crude Oil from Winter Melon (Benincasa hispida) Seed Using Response Surface Methodology and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant Activity, Total Phenolic Content and Fatty Acid Composition

机译:响应面法优化超声波辅助提取冬瓜种子中的原油及其抗氧化活性,总酚含量和脂肪酸组成

获取原文
           

摘要

In the present study, ultrasound-assisted extraction of crude oil from winter melon seeds was investigated through response surface methodology (RSM). Process variables were power level (25–75%), temperature (45–55 °C) and sonication time (20–40 min). It was found that all process variables have significant (p < 0.05) effects on the response variable. A central composite design (CCD) was used to determine the optimum process conditions. Optimal conditions were identified as 65% power level, 52 °C temperature and 36 min sonication time for maximum crude yield (108.62 mg-extract/g-dried matter). The antioxidant activity, total phenolic content and fatty acid composition of extract obtained under optimized conditions were determined and compared with those of oil obtained by the Soxhlet method. It was found that crude extract yield (CEY) of ultrasound-assisted extraction was lower than that of the Soxhlet method, whereas antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of the extract obtained by ultrasound-assisted extraction were clearly higher than those of the Soxhlet extract. Furthermore, both extracts were rich in unsaturated fatty acids. The major fatty acids of the both extracts were linoleic acid and oleic acid.
机译:在本研究中,通过响应面方法(RSM)研究了超声波辅助从冬瓜种子中提取原油的方法。过程变量是功率水平(25–75%),温度(45–55°C)和超声处理时间(20–40分钟)。发现所有过程变量对响应变量都有显着(p <0.05)影响。中央复合设计(CCD)用于确定最佳工艺条件。最佳条件确定为功率水平为65%,温度为52°C且超声处理时间为36分钟,以实现最大的粗品收率(108.62 mg提取物/ g干物质)。测定在最佳条件下获得的提取物的抗氧化活性,总酚含量和脂肪酸组成,并将其与通过索氏提取法获得的油进行比较。发现超声辅助提取的粗提物收率(CEY)低于索氏提取法,而超声辅助提取得到的提取物的抗氧化活性和总酚含量明显高于索氏提取法。此外,两种提取物均富含不饱和脂肪酸。两种提取物的主要脂肪酸为亚油酸和油酸。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Molecules》 |2012年第10期|共15页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 有机化学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号