...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia management of critically ill children: a pilot study evaluating guideline impact and feasibility in the PICU
【24h】

Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia management of critically ill children: a pilot study evaluating guideline impact and feasibility in the PICU

机译:重症儿童镇静和镇痛管理实践指南:一项评估PICU中指南影响和可行性的试验研究

获取原文

摘要

Aims The aim of this study was to develop and implement guidelines for sedation and analgesia management in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and evaluate the impact, feasibility and acceptability of these as part of a programme of research in this area and as a prelude to future trial work. Method This pilot study used a pre–post design using a historical control. Setting Two PICUs at different hospitals in an Australian metropolitan city. Participants Patients admitted to the PICU and ventilated for ≥24?h, aged more than 1?month and not admitted for seizure management or terminal care. Intervention Guidelines for sedation and analgesia management for critically ill children including algorithm and assessment tools. Outcome variables In addition to key outcome variables (ventilation time, medication dose and duration, length of stay), feasibility outcomes data (recruitment, data collection, safety) were evaluated. Guideline adherence was assessed through chart audit and staff were surveyed about merit and the use of guidelines. Results The guidelines were trialled for a total of 12?months on 63 patients and variables compared with the historical control group (n=75). Analysis revealed differences in median Morphine infusion duration between groups (pretest 3.63?days (87?h) vs post-test 2.83?days (68?h), p=0.05) and maximum doses (pretest 120?μg/kg/h vs post-test 97.5?μg/kg/h) with no apparent change to ventilation duration. Chart audit revealed varied use of tools, but staff were positive about the guidelines and their use in practice. Conclusions The sedation guidelines impacted on the duration and dosage of agents without any apparent impact on ventilation duration or length of stay. Furthermore, the guidelines appeared to be feasible and acceptable in clinical practice. The results of the study have laid the foundation for follow-up studies in withdrawal from sedation, point prevalence and longitudinal studies of sedation practices as well as drug trial work.
机译:目的本研究的目的是制定和实施儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的镇静和镇痛管理指南,并评估其影响,可行性和可接受性,作为该领域研究计划的一部分,并作为前奏将来的审判工作。方法该初步研究使用了具有历史对照的事前设计。在澳大利亚大城市的不同医院设置两个PICU。参与者入院并接受呼吸≥24?h的呼吸治疗,年龄大于1个月且未入院进行癫痫发作治疗或末期护理的患者。重症儿童镇静和镇痛管理干预指南,包括算法和评估工具。结果变量除了关键的结果变量(换气时间,药物剂量和持续时间,住院时间)之外,还评估了可行性结果数据(征募,数据收集,安全性)。通过图表审核评估了准则的遵守情况,并对员工的优点和准则的使用进行了调查。结果与63例历史对照组相比,该指南共对63名患者和变量进行了为期12个月的试验。分析显示,两组之间的吗啡中位输注时间中位数(测试前3.63天(87小时)与测试后2.83天(68小时),p = 0.05)和最大剂量(测试前120微克/公斤/小时vs试验后为97.5μg/ kg / h),通气时间没有明显变化。图表审计显示工具的使用多种多样,但工作人员对准则及其在实践中的使用持肯定态度。结论镇静指南影响了药物的持续时间和剂量,对通气时间或住院时间没有明显影响。此外,该指南在临床实践中似乎是可行和可接受的。研究结果为镇静治疗的退出,镇静措施的流行率和纵向研究以及药物试验工作的后续研究奠定了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号