首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Complementary and alternative asthma treatments and their association with asthma control: a population-based study
【24h】

Complementary and alternative asthma treatments and their association with asthma control: a population-based study

机译:补充和替代性哮喘治疗及其与哮喘控制的关联:一项基于人群的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives Many patients with asthma spend time and resources consuming complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs). This study explores whether CAM utilisation is associated with asthma control and the intake of asthma controller medications. Design Population-based, prospective cross-sectional study. Setting General population residing in two census areas in the province of British Columbia, Canada. Recruitment was based on random-digit dialling of both landlines and cell phones. Participants 486 patients with self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma (mean age 52?years; 67.3% woman). Primary and secondary outcome measures We assessed CAM use over the previous 12?months, level of asthma control as defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma and the self-reported intake of controller medications. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to study the relationship between any usage of CAMs (outcome), asthma control and controller medication usage, adjusted for potential confounders. Results A total of 179 (36.8%) of the sample reported CAM usage in the past 12?months. Breathing exercises (17.7%), herbal medicines (10.1%) and vitamins (9.7%) were the most popular CAMs reported. After adjustment, female sex (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.52) and uncontrolled asthma (vs controlled asthma, OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.89) were associated with a higher likelihood of using any CAMs in the past 12?months. Controller medication use was not associated with CAM usage in general and in the subgroups defined by asthma control. Conclusions Clinicians and policy makers need to be aware of the high prevalence of CAM use in patients with asthma and its association with lack of asthma control.
机译:目的许多哮喘患者花费时间和资源消耗补充和替代药物(CAMs)。这项研究探讨了CAM的利用是否与哮喘控制和哮喘控制药物的摄入有关。设计基于人群的前瞻性横断面研究。设置居住在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省两个人口普查地区的一般人口。招募是基于固定电话和手机的随机数字拨号。参与者486位自我报告为内科医师诊断为哮喘的患者(平均年龄52岁;女性占67.3%)。主要和次要结局指标我们评估了过去12个月中的CAM使用情况,全球哮喘倡议定义的哮喘控制水平以及自我报告的控制药物摄入量。进行多因素logistic回归研究,以对CAM的任何使用(结果),哮喘控制和控制者药物使用之间的关系进行研究,并针对潜在的混杂因素进行调整。结果在过去12个月中,共有179个样本(36.8%)报告了CAM使用情况。呼吸运动(17.7%),草药(10.1%)和维生素(9.7%)是最受欢迎的CAM。调整后,在过去的12个月中,女性(OR为1.66; 95%CI为1.09至2.52)和不受控制的哮喘病(相对于受控哮喘,OR 2.25,95%CI为1.30至3.89)与使用任何CAM的可能性更高。 。一般而言,在哮喘控制所定义的亚组中,控制药物的使用与CAM的使用无关。结论临床医生和政策制定者需要意识到哮喘患者使用CAM的普遍性及其与缺乏哮喘控制的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号