首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences >When Bioequivalence in Healthy Volunteers May not Translate to Bioequivalence in Patients: Differential Effects of Increased Gastric pH on the Pharmacokinetics of Levothyroxine Capsules and Tablets
【24h】

When Bioequivalence in Healthy Volunteers May not Translate to Bioequivalence in Patients: Differential Effects of Increased Gastric pH on the Pharmacokinetics of Levothyroxine Capsules and Tablets

机译:当健康志愿者的生物等效性不能转化为患者的生物等效性时:胃液pH升高对左甲状腺素胶囊和片剂的药代动力学的不同影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Clinical studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors may decrease levothyroxine absorption and an in vitro study suggested that the effect of pH on dissolution may differ with formulation. To determine the impact of formulation on the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine in altered gastric pH conditions, this study compared the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine capsules and tablets, two formulations deemed bioequivalent in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions, when taken with or without esomeprazole. Methods: Two clinical studies were conducted in healthy volunteers given single dose levothyroxine (600 mg) with a 45-day washout period. In Study 1 (parallel-design/two-way crossover), 16 subjects received either levothyroxine capsules or tablets, each group with or without prior administration of intravenous esomeprazole (maximum dose of 80 mg). In Study 2 (two-way crossover), 16 subjects received both capsules or tablets after intravenous esomeprazole. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 24 hours post-dose. Baseline-adjusted pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated: C max (maximal concentration), T max (time to C max ), AUC 0-t (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to the last detectable concentration), AUC 0-6 and AUC 0-12 (areas under the curve from 0 to 6 and 12 hours, respectively). Analyses of variance were conducted to compare ln-transformed C max and AUC. Non-parametric T max analyses were done. Results: In Study 1, esomeprazole caused a greater decrease in overall levothyroxine exposure of tablets vs. capsules (13% vs 6% for C max , 18% vs. 14% for AUC 0-6 , 17% vs. 5% for AUC 0-12 and 10% vs. 8% for AUC 0-t ). In Study 2 esomeprazole administration resulted in a 16% smaller levothyroxine exposure with tablets vs. capsules. No statistically significant differences in T max were found. Conclusions: Although both formulations are considered “bioequivalent” in healthy volunteers, they may not necessarily be bioequivalent in patients with impaired gastric pH conditions. Levothyroxine capsules may therefore be more appropriate for patients with decreased gastric acidity. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW . Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.
机译:目的:临床研究表明质子泵抑制剂可能会降低左甲状腺素的吸收,而体外研究表明pH值对溶出度的影响可能随制剂的不同而不同。为了确定在胃pH值变化的条件下制剂对左甲状腺素的药代动力学的影响,本研究比较了左旋甲状腺素胶囊和片剂的药代动力学,两种制剂在空腹条件下健康志愿者中是否具有生物等效性,无论是否服用埃索美拉唑。方法:在健康志愿者中进行了两项临床研究,他们服用了单剂量左甲状腺素(600毫克),洗脱期为45天。在研究1(平行设计/双向交叉)中,有16位受试者接受了左甲状腺素胶囊或片剂,每组分别接受或不接受静脉注射艾索美拉唑(最大剂量80毫克)。在研究2(双向交叉)中,有16位受试者在静脉注射艾美拉唑后接受了胶囊或片剂。给药前和给药后最多24小时收集血液样品。计算经基线调整的药代动力学参数:C max(最大浓度),T max(达到C max的时间),AUC 0-t(浓度-时间曲线下从0到最后可检测浓度的面积),AUC 0-6和AUC 0-12(曲线下的区域分别从0到6和12小时)。进行方差分析以比较经ln转换的C max和AUC。进行了非参数T max分析。结果:在研究1中,埃索美拉唑导致片剂和胶囊剂的总左甲状腺素暴露量下降幅度更大(C max分别为13%vs 6%,AUC 0-6分别为18%vs. 14%,AUC分别为17%vs. 5% 0-12和10%,而AUC 0-t则为8%)。在研究2中,与胶囊相比,埃索美拉唑的服用导致左甲状腺素减少了16%。没有发现T max的统计学显着差异。结论:尽管两种制剂在健康志愿者中都被认为是“生物等效的”,但在胃pH值受损的患者中未必一定是生物等效的。因此,左甲状腺素胶囊可能更适合胃酸度降低的患者。本文对POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW开放。已注册的读者(请参阅“针对读者”)可以通过在问题目录页面上单击摘要来发表评论。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号