首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Market Access & Health Policy >A price comparison of recently launched proprietary pharmaceuticals in the UK and the US
【24h】

A price comparison of recently launched proprietary pharmaceuticals in the UK and the US

机译:英国和美国最近推出的专有药品的价格比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To explore the relationship between prices charged by manufacturers of proprietary pharmaceuticals in the US and in the UK in recent years (2013–2016), expressed as a multiplier, and to detail to what extent this relationship differs for high-cost therapies used in smaller patient populations, as compared to lower-cost drugs. Methodology Therapies assessed by the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) in the UK between 1 January 2013 and 1 June 2016 were identified; only in-patent therapies were included in the analysis (to avoid the impact of price erosion post patent expiry); results were grouped according to annual cost per patient (whether considered high-cost, i.e., >£2,500 per patient per year, or not) and the size of the UK target population [whether considered orphan (<32,000 patients per year), ultra-orphan (<1,000 patients per year), or not]. Publicly listed prices were obtained in the US and UK and were adjusted where necessary to estimate the prices charged by manufacturers in the respective countries. The difference in price (per unit of the same strength and formulation) was calculated as a multiplier between the US and UK prices for each of the therapies identified. Results Based on the methodological approach described, 88 therapies were identified and included in the analysis. The multiplier between the US and UK prices was 3.64 for therapies with an estimated annual cost 32,000 down to <1,000, the US/UK price multipliers reduced from 2.13 for the former to 1.48 for the latter. Conclusion Although pharmaceutical prices have been found to be on average substantially higher in the US compared to the UK, our findings suggest that this price discrepancy is smaller for higher-cost therapies targeting small patient populations. Manufacturers of high-cost products should therefore factor this in when formulating pricing strategies because the potential for higher pricing in the US seems greater for primary care products targeting large patient populations.
机译:目的探讨最近几年(2013-2016年)美国和英国的专有药品制造商收取的价格之间的关系,以乘数表示,并详细说明这种关系在多大程度上与用于美国的高价疗法有关与低成本药物相比,患者人数较少。确定了2013年1月1日至2016年6月1日期间由英国苏格兰医学联合会(SMC)评估的方法学疗法;分析中仅包括专利疗法(以避免专利期满后价格下降的影响);结果根据每位患者的年度费用(是否考虑为高费用,即每位患者每年> 2,500,否)和英国目标人群的规模[是否考虑为孤儿(每年<32,000患者), -孤儿(每年<1,000名患者),或没有]。公开列出的价格是在美国和英国获得的,并在必要时进行了调整,以估算各个国家/地区的制造商收取的价格。价格差异(每单位相同强度和配方的价格差异)计算为所确定的每种疗法在美国和英国价格之间的乘数。结果基于所述方法学方法,鉴定了88种疗法并将其纳入分析。疗法在美国和英国之间的乘数为3.64,估计年度成本从32,000降至<1,000,美国/英国的乘数从前者的2.13减少至后者的1.48。结论尽管在美国,与英国相比,药品价格平均要高出许多,但我们的发现表明,针对较小患者群的高成本疗法的价格差异较小。因此,高成本产品的制造商应在制定定价策略时考虑到这一点,因为在美国,针对大量患者群体的初级保健产品的更高定价潜力更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号