首页> 外文会议>eceee industrial summer study on energy efficiency >Effects of energy and climate political regulations on electricity prices in paper, steel and aluminium production - a comparison for Germany, the Netherlands, the UK and France
【24h】

Effects of energy and climate political regulations on electricity prices in paper, steel and aluminium production - a comparison for Germany, the Netherlands, the UK and France

机译:能源和气候政治法规对造纸,钢铁和铝生产中电价的影响-德国,荷兰,英国和法国的比较

获取原文

摘要

The EU aims to reduce energy consumption and expand the renewable energy supply to ultimately reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Member states have introduced different instruments to trigger the necessary changes in the generation and use of energy. Often these instruments lead to price increases for consumers, but include preferential treatment for industrial electricity consumption. We investigate the electricity price differences resulting from several political instruments for sample companies from three energy-intensive sectors: paper, steel, and aluminium production. We find that net power prices may differ by 1.7 ct/kWh to 2.6 ct/kWh for the same company across countries. In Germany we observe a higher burden for a small than for a big paper mill. We note that the results show diverging power prices, but do not allow a conclusion on international competitiveness since we disregard other factors such as availability of raw material or proximity to key markets. We also neglect differences in spot market prices that influence power purchase prices available to companies. Importantly, power prices influence the profitability of energy efficiency investments. Lower power prices decrease the pay-off from energy efficiency investments and increase amortization time. But improved efficiency also decreases annual power costs. An efficiency improvement of 5 % could decrease power cost by 0.1 to 8 million euro/a depending on the annual power consumption, presumed that the investment is viable. In relation to power consumption before the improvement, this corresponds to savings of 0.23 ct/kWh to 0.37 ct/kWh. This effect is nearly by factor 10 smaller than policy driven differences. Hence, energy efficiency could mitigate effects from politically driven power price differences, yet, it is unlikely to fully compensate for them. It is good news that preferential treatment is often coupled with the existence of an energy management system or energy efficiency targets.
机译:欧盟旨在减少能源消耗并扩大可再生能源供应,以最终减少温室气体排放。成员国采用了不同的手段来触发能源的产生和使用的必要变化。这些工具通常会导致消费者提高价格,但包括对工业用电量的优惠待遇。我们调查了来自三种能源密集型行业(造纸,钢铁和铝生产)的样本公司的几种政治手段所产生的电价差异。我们发现,同一国家/地区的同一家公司的净电价可能相差1.7 ct / kWh至2.6 ct / kWh。在德国,与大型造纸厂相比,小型造纸厂的负担更大。我们注意到,结果显示出不同的电价,但由于我们无视其他因素(例如原材料的可获得性或与关键市场的接近),因此无法得出国际竞争力的结论。我们还忽略了现货市场价格的差异,这些差异会影响公司可获得的电力购买价格。重要的是,电价会影响能效投资的盈利能力。较低的电价会减少能源效率投资的回报,并增加摊销时间。但是,提高效率还可以降低年度电力成本。假设投资可行,则5%的效率提高可将电力成本降低0.1到800万欧元/年,具体取决于年耗电量。关于改进之前的功耗,这相当于节省了0.23 ct / kWh至0.37 ct / kWh。这种影响几乎比政策驱动的差异小10倍。因此,能源效率可以减轻政治驱动的电价差异带来的影响,但是,不可能完全弥补这些差异。好消息是,优惠待遇通常与能源管理系统或能源效率目标的存在结合在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号