首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >An Examination of Commercial International Dispute Resolution Framework in Ghana and the United Kingdom Arbitration System
【24h】

An Examination of Commercial International Dispute Resolution Framework in Ghana and the United Kingdom Arbitration System

机译:加纳和英国仲裁系统对国际商事争议解决框架的审查

获取原文
       

摘要

Over the last decade, the Administration of Justice through the Ghana’s regular courts has encountered with a lot of international commercial activity problems. Among them are constant delays. An attempt to eliminate these delays and ensure faster justice delivery has seen the importance of arbitration in Ghana. The expedition for speedy and vigorous implementation, resulting in more efficiency in contract drafting, has at all times dominated international commercial dealings. Hence the need for resorting to arbitration is more compelling, overlooking the lethargic attitude of Ghanaian courts, to the resolution of sophisticated commercial disputes. The study therefore examined commercial international dispute resolution framework in Ghana and the United Kingdom arbitration system. The paper used stratified random sampling technique to sample 100 respondents for the data analyses. The study underscored that the commercial arbitration (both international and local) was in common use of resolving commercial dispute. Also, the study further posited that commercial arbitration (both local and international) is more effective in resolving commercial disputes as compared to the traditional courts systems. Finally, the study recommended that when adjudicating over disputes that have foreign elements, the Ghana’s judicial officers must approach it with prudence, most especially when the issues before relates to public policy.
机译:在过去的十年中,通过加纳的常规法院进行的司法管理遇到了许多国际商业活动问题。其中包括持续的延迟。消除这些拖延并确保更快地实现司法公正的尝试已经看到了加纳进行仲裁的重要性。迅速而有力地执行这一探险活动,使合同起草效率更高,一直在国际商业交易中占主导地位。因此,诉诸仲裁的需求更加迫切,而忽略了加纳法院对解决复杂的商业纠纷的不安态度。因此,该研究审查了加纳和联合王国仲裁系统中的国际商业争议解决框架。本文采用分层随机抽样技术对100位受访者进行抽样,以进行数据分析。该研究强调,商事仲裁(国际和本地)是解决商事争议的常用方法。此外,该研究还认为,与传统法院系统相比,商事仲裁(本地和国际商事仲裁)在解决商事争议方面更为有效。最后,该研究建议加纳的司法人员在裁定具有外国元素的纠纷时,必须审慎地进行处理,尤其是以前涉及公共政策的问题时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号