首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management and Sustainability >Positivist and Non-Positivist Paradigm in Social Science Research: Conflicting Paradigms or Perfect Partners?
【24h】

Positivist and Non-Positivist Paradigm in Social Science Research: Conflicting Paradigms or Perfect Partners?

机译:社会科学研究中的实证主义和非实证主义范式:冲突的范式还是完美的伙伴?

获取原文
           

摘要

The idea of a paradigm or worldview as an overarching framework which organizes our entire approach to being in the globe has become usual since Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in 1962. This paper therefore critically examined the positivist and a non positivist research paradigm in social science research. It was revealed that the two paradigms are opposing each other. The findings show that positivist and a non positivist research are conflicting paradigms and a researcher needs to cortically evaluate each and every paradigm before employing it in his research activities. Conclusion was eventually drawn based on the literature findings.
机译:自1962年库恩(Kuhn)发表《科学革命的结构》以来,将范式或世界观作为一个整体框架来组织我们在全球范围内的整体方法的想法就变得很常见。科学研究。结果表明,这两种范式相互对立。研究结果表明,实证主义研究与非实证主义研究是相互矛盾的范式,研究人员需要在将其应用于研究活动之前,对其每个范式进行恰当的评估。最终根据文献发现得出结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号