首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >The Effect of Instructional Methods (Lecture-Discussion versus Group Discussion) and Teaching Talent on Teacher Trainees Student Learning Outcomes
【24h】

The Effect of Instructional Methods (Lecture-Discussion versus Group Discussion) and Teaching Talent on Teacher Trainees Student Learning Outcomes

机译:教学方法(课堂讨论与小组讨论)和教学才能对教师实习生学习成果的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

The aim of this study is to examine difference in the effect of instructional methods (lecture-discussion versus group discussion) and teaching talent on theacher trainees student learning outcomes. It was conducted by a quasi-experimental design using the factorialized (2 x 2) version of the nonequivalent control group design. The subjects were 168 students as teachers trainees from eight study programs in Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Jember, Indonesia. Data collected were analyzed by two-way Analysis of Variances (ANOVA). Results of the study showed that (1) the learning outcomes of students taught by the lecture-discussion method were different from those of students taught by the group discussion method with F test of 111.864, significant at p<.05 and the relatively strong effect size of .406. The group discussion method was proven to be more effective in improving the student learning outcomes than the lecture-discussion method; (2) the difference in teaching talent affected difference in student learning outcomes with F test of 128.708, significant at p <.05 and the relatively strong effect size of .440. Students with higher teaching talent tended to achieve higher learning outcomes among both groups of students taught using either lecture-discussion or group discussion methods. However, students with lower teaching talent tended to achieve lower learning outcomes among both groups of students taught using either lecture-discussion or group discussion methods; (3) the interaction of lecture-discussion vs group discussion methods and teaching talent significantly affected student learning outcomes with F test of 91.713, significant at p<.05 and the relatively strong effect size of .359.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验教学方法(课堂讨论与小组讨论)和教学才能对实习生学生学习成果的影响之间的差异。它是通过非等效对照组设计的因子分解(2 x 2)版本通过准实验设计进行的。主题为168名学生,是印度尼西亚Jember大学教师培训和教育学院八个学习计划的教师培训生。通过双向方差分析(ANOVA)分析收集的数据。研究结果表明:(1)演讲讨论法教学的学生的学习结果与小组讨论法教学的学生的学习结果有所不同,F检验为111.864,在p <.05时显着,效果相对较强。大小为.406。事实证明,小组讨论方法比讲课方法更有效地提高了学生的学习效果。 (2)教学能力差异影响学生学习成果的差异,F检验为128.708,在p <.05时显着,相对强的效应值为.440。具有较高教学才能的学生倾向于在通过演讲讨论或小组讨论的方式来授课的两组学生中获得更高的学习成果。然而,教学能力较低的学生倾向于通过演讲讨论或小组讨论的方式在两组学生中取得较低的学习成果。 (3)课堂讨论与小组讨论方法以及教学才能的相互作用显着影响学生的学习成果,F检验为91.713,在p <.05时显着,而相对强的效应值为.359。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号