首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. >Preclinical evaluation of a semi‐automated and rapid commercial electrophoresis assay for von Willebrand factor multimers
【24h】

Preclinical evaluation of a semi‐automated and rapid commercial electrophoresis assay for von Willebrand factor multimers

机译:von Willebrand因子多聚体半自动快速商业电泳分析的临床前评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer test is required to correctly subtype qualitative type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD). The current VWF multimer assays are difficult, nonstandardized, and time‐consuming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of the commercial VWF multimer kit by Sebia (Lisses, France), an electrophoresis technique yielding same‐day results. Methods Ten healthy volunteer plasma samples, in‐house reference plasma (IRP) and commercial normal plasma (CNP) samples, 10 plasma samples from patients with a known VWD type, 1 hemophilia A plasma sample, and 7 external quality assurance (EQA) samples were analyzed using the commercial VWF multimer kit. Additional coagulation testing included measurements of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity (VWF:Ac), and FVIII activity (FVIII:C). Results The CNP results revealed a relative loss of the highest molecular weight multimers; therefore, IRP was preferred as the reference sample. The interpretations of 10 patients with a known VWD type could be successfully reproduced and agreed with previous VWF multimer results. In all EQA surveys, the multimer results and final VWD diagnosis agreed with expert opinion. Conclusions The VWF multimer assay by Sebia is easy to perform and can be successfully implemented in any clinical laboratory for second‐stage evaluation of VWD. The resolution power of multimer distribution is adequate to correctly classify VWD types 1, 2A, 2B, and 3.
机译:背景技术需要将von Willebrand因子(VWF)多聚体测试正确地定性为2型定性von Willebrand疾病(VWD)。当前的VWF多聚体测定困难,不标准化且耗时。这项研究的目的是评估由Sebia(法国利塞斯)生产的商用VWF多聚体试剂盒的临床实用性,该电泳技术可产生当日结果。方法10份健康的自愿性血浆样本,内部参考血浆(IRP)和商业正常血浆(CNP)样本,10例来自已知VWD类型患者的血浆样本,1例血友病A血浆样本和7份外部质量保证(EQA)样本使用商用VWF多聚体试剂盒进行分析。额外的凝血测试包括VWF抗原(VWF:Ag),VWF活性(VWF:Ac)和FVIII活性(FVIII:C)的测量。结果CNP结果显示最高分子量的多聚体相对损失。因此,IRP优选作为参考样品。可以成功复制10例具有已知VWD类型的患者的解释,并与先前的VWF多聚体结果一致。在所有EQA调查中,多聚体结果和最终VWD诊断均与专家意见一致。结论Sebia的VWF多聚体测定法操作简便,可在任何临床实验室成功进行VWD的第二阶段评估。多聚体分布的分辨能力足以正确分类VWD类型1、2A,2B和3。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号