首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

机译:关节内富血小板血浆与透明质酸治疗膝骨性关节炎的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) have been increasingly used in recent years to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, whether PRP is superior to HA is controversial. Methods: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane library. The pooled data were analyzed using RevMan 5.1. Results: Three prospective and ten randomized trials were identified. PRP injections reduced pain more effectively than HA injections in OA of the knee at 6 months (mean difference [MD]=-14.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -26.12 to -2.23; P =0.02; I 2=95%) and 12 months (MD=-15.25; 95% CI: -22.17 to -8.32; P 2=81%) of follow-up evaluated by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score, while the VAS showed no significant difference at 3 months (MD=-0.98; 95% CI: -2.55 to 0.59; P =0.22; I 2=90%) and 6 months (MD=-0.82; 95% CI: -1.80 to 0.16; P =0.1; I 2=83%). Additionally, similar results were observed for the function recovery according to the WOMAC function score and EuroQol-visual analog scales. Conclusion: The intra-articular injection of PRP was not obviously superior to HA in knee OA. Due to the limited quality and data of the evidence currently available, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are required.
机译:目的:近年来,富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)越来越多地用于治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)。但是,PRP是否优于HA仍存在争议。方法:我们对PubMed,Embase,ScienceDirect和Cochrane库进行了电子搜索。使用RevMan 5.1分析合并的数据。结果:确定了三项前瞻性试验和十项随机试验。在6个月时,PRP注射比HA注射更有效地减轻了膝部OA的疼痛(平均差[MD] =-14.18; 95%置信区间[CI]:-26.12至-2.23; P = 0.02; I 2 = 95%)和12个月(MD = -15.25; 95%CI:-22.17至-8.32; P 2 = 81%)的随访由西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数评估(WOMAC)疼痛评分,而VAS在3个月时无显着差异(MD = -0.98; 95%CI:-2.55至0.59; P = 0.22; I 2 = 90%)和6月(MD = -0.82; 95%CI:-1.80至0.16; P = 0.1; I 2 = 83%)。此外,根据WOMAC功能评分和EuroQol-visual模拟量表,在功能恢复方面观察到了相似的结果。结论:关节内注射PRP不能明显优于HA。由于当前可用证据的质量和数据有限,因此需要更多高质量的随机对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号