首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Difference in the effects of switching from Candesartan to Olmesartan or Telmisartan to Olmesartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the COTO study
【24h】

Difference in the effects of switching from Candesartan to Olmesartan or Telmisartan to Olmesartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the COTO study

机译:COTO研究显示,从坎地沙坦改用奥美沙坦或替米沙坦改用奥美沙坦对2型糖尿病高血压患者的疗效差异

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: This open-label controlled study compared the therapeutic efficacy of three representative angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes attending a hospital outpatient clinic.?The primary measure in this study was morning home blood pressure (BP). Patients and methods: Two studies were done concurrently to investigate the effects of switching from two different ARBs to olmesartan. Patients prescribed candesartan (8 mg once daily in the morning) or telmisartan (40 mg once daily in the morning) for 16 weeks were switched to olmesartan (20 mg once daily in the morning) for 16 weeks. Then, they were switched back to candesartan (CO group) or telmisartan (TO group) for another 16 weeks. Results: Data from all patients in the CO group (n=165) and the TO group (n=152) were analyzed. Clinic and morning home BP and urinary albumin levels showed a significant decrease from baseline at 16 weeks after switching to olmesartan in both the CO and the TO group (clinic BP, morning home diastolic BP, and urinary albumin, P<0.05; morning home systolic BP, P<0.01). In contrast, clinic BP, morning home BP, and urinary albumin were significantly increased again 16 weeks after switching back to candesartan or telmisartan (clinic BP, morning home diastolic BP, and urinary albumin, P<0.05; morning home systolic BP, P<0.01). No subjects experienced an adverse reaction that required withdrawal from the study. No adverse reactions attributable to the study drugs were observed. Conclusion: Olmesartan is a promising ARB for BP control in hypertensive type 2 diabetics.
机译:目的:这项开放标签的对照研究比较了三种代表性血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARBs)对在医院门诊就诊的2型糖尿病高血压患者的疗效。这项研究的主要措施是晨间血压(BP)。 。患者和方法:两项研究同时进行,以研究从两种不同的ARB转换为奥美沙坦的影响。服用坎地沙坦(每天一次8毫克,每天一次)或替米沙坦(每天一次40毫克,每天一次)16周的患者改用奥美沙坦(每天一次20毫克,每天一次)。然后,他们又改用坎地沙坦(CO组)或替米沙坦(TO组),持续16周。结果:分析了来自CO组(n = 165)和TO组(n = 152)的所有患者的数据。 CO组和TO组均在切换至奥美沙坦后16周,临床和早间血压和尿白蛋白水平均较基线水平显着降低(诊所血压,早间舒张压和尿白蛋白,P <0.05;早间收缩期BP,P <0.01)。相比之下,改用坎地沙坦或替米沙坦后16周,诊所血压,晨间血压和尿白蛋白又显着增加(诊所血压,晨间舒张压和尿白蛋白,P <0.05;晨间收缩压,P < 0.01)。没有受试者经历不良反应,需要退出研究。没有观察到归因于研究药物的不良反应。结论:奥美沙坦是用于控制高血压2型糖尿病患者的有前途的ARB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号