首页> 外文期刊>Health Economics Review >Design and implementation of community engagement interventions towards healthcare quality improvement in Ghana: a methodological approach
【24h】

Design and implementation of community engagement interventions towards healthcare quality improvement in Ghana: a methodological approach

机译:设计和实施旨在提高加纳医疗质量的社区参与干预措施:一种方法论方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Nearly four decades after the Alma-Ata declaration of 1978 on the need for active client/community participation in healthcare, not much has been achieved in this regard particularly in resource constrained countries like Ghana, where over 70 % of communities in rural areas access basic healthcare from primary health facilities. Systematic Community Engagement (SCE) in healthcare quality assessment remains a grey area in many health systems in Africa, albeit the increasing importance in promoting universal access to quality basic healthcare services. Purpose/objective Design and implement SCE interventions that involve existing community groups engaged in healthcare quality assessment in 32 intervention primary health facilities. Methods The SCE interventions form part of a four year randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the Greater Accra and Western regions of Ghana. Community groups ( n ?=?52) were purposively recruited and engaged to assess non-technical components of healthcare quality, recommend quality improvement plans and reward best performing facilities. The interventions comprised of five cyclical implementation steps executed for nearly a year. Wilcoxon sign rank test was used to ascertain differences in group perceptions of service quality during the first and second assessments, and ordered logistic regression analysis performed to determine factors associated with groups’ perception of healthcare quality. Results Healthcare quality was perceived to be lowest in non-technical areas such as: information provision to clients, directional signs in clinics, drug availability, fairness in queuing, waiting times, and information provision on use of suggestion boxes and feedback on clients’ complaints. Overall, services in private health facilities were perceived to be better than public facilities ( p ?
机译:背景信息在1978年阿拉木图关于需要积极的客户/社区参与医疗保健的宣言之后的将近40年,在这方面并没有取得多少成就,尤其是在加纳这样的资源有限的国家中,农村地区超过70%的社区可以使用来自初级卫生保健机构的基本医疗保健。在非洲许多卫生系统中,医疗质量评估中的系统性社区参与(SCE)仍然是一个灰色地带,尽管在促进普及高质量的基本医疗服务方面越来越重要。目的/目的设计和实施SCE干预措施,涉及32个干预性初级卫生机构中参与医疗质量评估的现有社区团体。方法SCE干预措施是在加纳大阿克拉和西部地区进行的为期四年的随机对照试验(RCT)的一部分。目的招募社区团体(n = 52),以评估医疗质量的非技术组成部分,推荐质量改进计划并奖励表现最佳的设施。干预措施由执行了将近一年的五个周期性实施步骤组成。在第一次和第二次评估中,使用了Wilcoxon符号等级检验来确定小组对服务质量的看法的差异,并进行有序逻辑回归分析以确定与小组对医疗质量的看法有关的因素。结果在非技术领域,医疗保健质量被认为是最低的,例如:向客户提供信息,诊所的方向指示,药物供应,排队的公平性,等待时间以及关于使用建议箱和客户投诉反馈的信息。总体而言,人们认为私人医疗机构的服务要好于公共机构(p <0.05)。由工匠和老年人(60岁(+)岁以上)主导的社区群体对医疗质量的看法要比青年群体(Coef。= 1.78; 95%CI?=?[?0.16 3.72])和其他类别的社区群体( Coef。= 0.98; 95%CI≤α[≤0.102.06]。结论医疗质量的非技术组成部分对于主要医疗提供商所服务的客户和社区仍然至关重要。 SCE概念是一种潜在的创新性和补充性质量改进策略,可以帮助增强客户体验,对医疗保健提供者的信任和信心。 SCE干预措施更具成本效益,以社区为中心,可以由地方卫生当局轻松扩展和维持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号