首页> 外文期刊>Thermal science >Theoretical analysis of the cumulative costs of different diesel bus alternatives for a public transport in the city of Belgrade
【24h】

Theoretical analysis of the cumulative costs of different diesel bus alternatives for a public transport in the city of Belgrade

机译:贝尔格莱德市公共交通的不同柴油公交车替代品累积成本的理论分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper includes comparative analysis of the environmental, energetic, and financial costs of different bus propulsion, possibly applied on the public transport in the city of Belgrade. It considers the modern diesel bus, the trolleybus, the natural gas bus with the spark ignition engine, the electric bus using LiFePO4 battery, and the electric bus with ultra-capacitor. The results are presented according to the real data and the real electro-energetic situation in Serbia, with the dominantly used lignite coal as primary fuel. This model gives the exact exhaust emission of electric vehicles at the thermal power plant, enables its comparison to the internal combustion engine vehicles. The result in analysis shows that the natural gas bus is the most cost efficient in economical way with overall exploitation price of $87 per 100 km. The trolleybus is more economical then the natural gas powered bus only at high departures rate, higher than 230 per workday.
机译:本文包括对可能在贝尔格莱德市的公共交通中应用的不同公交车推进的环境,能源和财务成本的比较分析。它考虑了现代柴油客车,无轨电车,带火花点火发动机的天然气客车,使用LiFePO4电池的电动客车以及带有超级电容器的电动客车。结果是根据塞尔维亚的实际数据和实际的电能状况给出的,其中主要使用褐煤作为主要燃料。该模型给出了火力发电厂中电动汽车的确切排放量,使其能够与内燃机汽车进行比较。分析结果表明,天然气公交车是最经济有效的方式,整体开采价格为每100公里87美元。仅在高发车率(每工作日高于230)的情况下,无轨电车比天然气汽车更经济。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号