...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy, 123I-MIBG Scintigraphy, and 18F-FDG PET
【24h】

Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy, 123I-MIBG Scintigraphy, and 18F-FDG PET

机译:神经内分泌肿瘤的功能成像:生长抑素受体显像,123I-MIBG显像和18F-FDG PET的头对头比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

id="p-1">Functional techniques are playing a pivotal role in the imaging of cancer today. Our aim was to compare, on a head-to-head basis, 3 functional imaging techniques in patients with histologically verified neuroendocrine tumors: somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-octreotide, scintigraphy with 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), and 18F-FDG PET. >Methods: Ninety-six prospectively enrolled patients with neuroendocrine tumors underwent SRS, 123I-MIBG scintigraphy, and 18F-FDG PET on average within 40 d. The functional images were fused with low-dose CT scans for anatomic localization, and the imaging results were compared with the proliferation index as determined by Ki67. >Results: The overall sensitivity of SRS, 123I-MIBG scintigraphy, and 18F-FDG PET was 89%, 52%, and 58%, respectively. Of the 11 SRS-negative patients, 7 were 18F-FDG PET-positive, of which 3 were also 123I-MIBG scintigraphy-positive, giving a combined overall sensitivity of 96%. SRS also exceeded 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET based on the number of lesions detected (393, 185, and 225, respectively) and tumor subtypes. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy was superior to 18F-FDG PET for ileal neuroendocrine tumors, and 18F-FDG PET was superior to 123I-MIBG scintigraphy for pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumors. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET (92%) exceeded that of both SRS (69%) and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy (46%) for tumors with a proliferation index above 15%. >Conclusion: The overall sensitivity of 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET was low compared with SRS. However, for tumors with a high proliferation rate, 18F-FDG PET had the highest sensitivity. The results indicate that, although SRS should still be the routine method, 18F-FDG PET provides complementary diagnostic information and is of value for neuroendocrine tumor patients with negative SRS findings or a high proliferation index.
机译:id =“ p-1”>功能技术在当今的癌症成像中起着举足轻重的作用。我们的目的是比较经过组织学验证的神经内分泌肿瘤患者的三种功能成像技术:生长抑素受体闪烁显像(SRS)和 111 In-二亚乙基三胺五乙酸-奥曲肽,闪烁显像含 123 I-甲硫基苄基胍(MIBG)和 18 F-FDG PET。 >方法:对平均有96例神经内分泌肿瘤的患者进行了SRS, 123 I-MIBG闪烁显像和 18 F-FDG PET 40天将功能图像与低剂量CT扫描融合以进行解剖定位,并将成像结果与通过Ki67确定的增殖指数进行比较。 >结果:SRS, 123 I-MIBG闪烁显像和 18 F-FDG PET的总体敏感性分别为89%,52%和58 %, 分别。在11例SRS阴性患者中, 18 F-FDG PET阳性7例,其中3例 123 I-MIBG闪烁显像阳性,从而综合了总体敏感性96%。根据检测到的病变数量(分别为393、185和225)和肿瘤亚型,SRS也超过了 123 I-MIBG闪烁显像和 18 F-FDG PET。对于回肠神经内分泌肿瘤, 123 I-MIBG闪烁显像优于 18 F-FDG PET, 18 F-FDG PET优于 123 I-MIBG闪烁显像检查胰腺十二指肠神经内分泌肿瘤。 18 F-FDG PET(92%)的敏感性超过SRS(69%)和 123 I-MIBG闪烁显像(46%)指数高于15%。 >结论:与SRS相比, 123 I-MIBG闪烁显像和 18 F-FDG PET的总体敏感性较低。但是,对于高增殖率的肿瘤, 18 F-FDG PET的敏感性最高。结果表明,尽管SRS仍应作为常规方法,但 18 F-FDG PET可提供补充的诊断信息,对于SRS阴性或增殖指数高的神经内分泌肿瘤患者具有重要价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号