...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: a head-to-head comparison of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, 123I-MIBG scintigraphy, and 18F-FDG PET.
【24h】

Functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: a head-to-head comparison of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, 123I-MIBG scintigraphy, and 18F-FDG PET.

机译:神经内分泌肿瘤的功能成像:生长抑素受体闪烁显像,123I-MIBG闪烁显像和18F-FDG PET的头对头比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Functional techniques are playing a pivotal role in the imaging of cancer today. Our aim was to compare, on a head-to-head basis, 3 functional imaging techniques in patients with histologically verified neuroendocrine tumors: somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with (111)In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-octreotide, scintigraphy with (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), and (18)F-FDG PET. METHODS: Ninety-six prospectively enrolled patients with neuroendocrine tumors underwent SRS, (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy, and (18)F-FDG PET on average within 40 d. The functional images were fused with low-dose CT scans for anatomic localization, and the imaging results were compared with the proliferation index as determined by Ki67. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of SRS, (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy, and (18)F-FDG PET was 89%, 52%, and 58%, respectively. Of the 11 SRS-negative patients, 7 were (18)F-FDG PET-positive, of which 3 were also (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy-positive, giving a combined overall sensitivity of 96%. SRS also exceeded (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy and (18)F-FDG PET based on the number of lesions detected (393, 185, and 225, respectively) and tumor subtypes. (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy was superior to (18)F-FDG PET for ileal neuroendocrine tumors, and (18)F-FDG PET was superior to (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy for pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumors. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET (92%) exceeded that of both SRS (69%) and (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy (46%) for tumors with a proliferation index above 15%. CONCLUSION: The overall sensitivity of (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy and (18)F-FDG PET was low compared with SRS. However, for tumors with a high proliferation rate, (18)F-FDG PET had the highest sensitivity. The results indicate that, although SRS should still be the routine method, (18)F-FDG PET provides complementary diagnostic information and is of value for neuroendocrine tumor patients with negative SRS findings or a high proliferation index.
机译:功能技术在当今的癌症成像中起着举足轻重的作用。我们的目的是比较经过组织学验证的神经内分泌肿瘤患者的三种功能成像技术:生长抑素受体闪烁显像(SRS)与(111)In-二亚乙基三胺五乙酸-奥曲肽,闪烁显像与(123)I -甲磺基苄基胍(MIBG)和(18)F-FDG PET。方法:平均在40 d内,有96例预期入选的神经内分泌肿瘤患者接受了SRS,(123)I-MIBG闪烁显像和(18)F-FDG PET。将功能图像与小剂量CT扫描融合以进行解剖学定位,并将成像结果与通过Ki67确定的增殖指数进行比较。结果:SRS,(123)I-MIBG闪烁显像和(18)F-FDG PET的总敏感性分别为89%,52%和58%。在这11例SRS阴性患者中,有7例为(18)F-FDG PET阳性,其中3例为(123)I-MIBG闪烁显像阳性,综合总体敏感性为96%。根据检测到的病变数量(分别为393、185和225)和肿瘤亚型,SRS也超过了(123)I-MIBG闪烁显像和(18)F-FDG PET。在回肠神经内分泌肿瘤方面,(123)I-MIBG闪烁显像优于(18)F-FDG PET,在胰十二指肠神经内分泌肿瘤方面,(18)F-FDG PET显着优于(123)I-MIBG闪烁显像。 (18)F-FDG PET(92%)的敏感性超过了SRS(69%)和(123)I-MIBG闪烁显像法(46%)对增殖指数高于15%的肿瘤的敏感性。结论:与SRS相比,(123)I-MIBG闪烁显像和(18)F-FDG PET的总体敏感性较低。然而,对于具有高增殖率的肿瘤,(18)F-FDG PET具有最高的敏感性。结果表明,尽管SRS仍应作为常规方法,但(18)F-FDG PET可提供补充的诊断信息,对于SRS阴性或增殖指数高的神经内分泌肿瘤患者具有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号