首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >A Brief Interprofessional “Guess My Role” Game Improves Residents' Knowledge About Team Roles
【24h】

A Brief Interprofessional “Guess My Role” Game Improves Residents' Knowledge About Team Roles

机译:一个简短的跨职业“猜我的角色”游戏,提高居民对团队角色的了解

获取原文
           

摘要

Setting and Problem Physicians must work effectively in teams, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires that residency programs teach trainees team skills. To successfully participate in well-functioning teams, physicians first need to understand the roles of other team members. We developed a highly engaging “Guess My Role” game to teach our internal medicine residents about the roles of nonphysician health care professionals with whom they work, and we conducted a preliminary study of the game's impact on residents' knowledge about these professional roles.;Intervention Study team members used a modified Delphi method to identify the 15 nonphysician professionals who most commonly interact with residents and whose roles are poorly understood by the residents. The professions identified included pharmacists, respiratory, occupational, and physical therapists, chaplains, risk managers, nurses (charge and floor), social workers, case managers, sitters (nonmedical personnel who supervise patients for safety), patient care technicians, dietitians, unit secretaries, patient relations professionals, and care coordinators. Leaders from each profession were invited to list the top 5 things they wished physicians knew about their given profession's role. We used the lists to create a true/false knowledge test about each of the 15 professional roles. The knowledge test was generated by adding 1 false statement to each submitted list and inverting 1 submitted item to make it false, thereby yielding 6 possible correct answers for the 12 professions that submitted 5 items, and 5 possible correct answers for 1 profession that submitted 4 items. This resulted in a knowledge test with 76 possible correct answers/points. The knowledge test and scoring is available from the authors. The Guess My Role game occurred during a regularly scheduled 1-hour conference and included residents, teaching service faculty, medical students, and nonphysician professionals. Upon arrival, residents, faculty, and student participants completed the knowledge pretest. Afterward, a name tag designating the role of 1 nonphysician team member (eg, “social worker”) was placed on each participant's back in a position that did not allow him or her to read the assigned profession. Each participant was instructed to ask other participants up to 10 yeso questions in order to guess their assigned profession. Once they were confident in identifying their assigned profession, participants sat at a table with the nonphysician professional that best matched their “guessed” role, joining other participants who also believed they were assigned the same role. At each table, participants discussed questions they used to identify their “guessed” profession. Each nonphysician professional leader then addressed the larger group with a 1-minute summary detailing their actual role and clarified common misperceptions identified in the small group discussions. At the conclusion of the session, participants completed a repeat knowledge test identical to the preintervention test. The intervention was conducted under Institutional Review Board approval.;Outcomes to Date The game intervention engendered enthusiastic participation and positive comments from all participants. Thirty-three participants (medical students, residents, and faculty) completed the pretest, and 25 participants completed the posttest. There was statistically significant improvement in both the residents' and the participants' knowledge of nonphysician roles after the Guess My Role intervention (mean score of 56 points versus mean score of 52 points; P = .014; TABLE). For both tests, there were nonsignificant trends favoring higher scores with higher levels of training. View larger version (9K) TABLE Preintervention and Postintervention Scores on Roles Knowledge Test
机译:设置和问题医师必须在团队中有效地工作,而研究生医学教育认可委员会要求住院医师课程必须培训受训者团队技能。为了成功地参加运作良好的团队,医生首先需要了解其他团队成员的角色。我们开发了一个高度引人入胜的“猜我的角色”游戏,以向我们的内科医学居民教授与他们一起工作的非内科医疗保健专业人员的角色,并且我们对该游戏对居民对这些专业角色知识的影响进行了初步研究。干预研究小组的成员使用一种改进的Delphi方法来确定15位非医生专业人员,这些专业人员最常与居民互动,并且居民对其角色的理解较差。确定的专业包括药剂师,呼吸,职业和物理治疗师,牧师,风险管理人员,护士(主管和地板),社会工作者,病例管理员,保姆(监督患者安全的非医疗人员),患者护理技术人员,营养师,部门秘书,患者关系专业人员和护理协调员。每个行业的领导者都被邀请列出他们希望医生知道的关于他们特定行业角色的五件事。我们使用列表创建了关于15个专业角色中每个角色的正确/错误知识测试。知识测试是通过向每个提交的列表中添加1个错误陈述并反转1个提交的项目以使其为假而生成的,从而为提交5个项目的12个行业提供6个可能的正确答案,对于提交了4个项目的1个行业提供5个可能的正确答案项目。这导致了一个知识测验,其中包含76个可能的正确答案/分。作者可以进行知识测验和评分。 “猜我角色”游戏发生在定期安排的1个小时的会议上,其中包括居民,教学服务教师,医学生和非医师专业人士。到达后,居民,教职员工和学生参与者完成了知识预测。之后,在每个参与者的背上放置一个名称标签,指定一名非医师团队成员的角色(例如,“社会工作者”),该位置不允许他或她阅读指定的专业。每个参与者被指示最多向其他参与者提问10个是/否问题,以猜测他们分配的专业。一旦他们对确定分配的职业充满信心,参与者就可以与最能胜任其“猜测”角色的非内科医师坐在一起,与其他也认为他们被分配相同角色的参与者一起坐在桌旁。在每张桌子上,参加者讨论了他们用来识别“被猜测”职业的问题。然后,每位非医师专业领导者都要向大型小组发表1分钟的摘要,详细说明其实际角色,并澄清小组讨论中发现的常见误解。在会议结束时,参与者完成了与干预前测试相同的重复知识测试。干预是在机构审查委员会的批准下进行的。迄今为止的结果游戏干预引起了热烈的参与和所有参与者的积极评价。 33名参与者(医学生,居民和教职员工)完成了前测,25名参与者完成了后测。在“猜测我的角色”干预后,居民和参与者对非医师角色的了解在统计学上均有显着改善(平均得分为56分,平均得分为52分; P = 0.014;表)。对于这两个测试,都有不显着的趋势,即倾向于较高的分数和较高的培训水平。查看大图(9K)表角色知识测试中的干预前和干预后分数

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号