...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Relationship Between Postinterview Correspondence From Residency Program Applicants and Subsequent Applicant Match Outcomes
【24h】

Relationship Between Postinterview Correspondence From Residency Program Applicants and Subsequent Applicant Match Outcomes

机译:居住计划申请人的面试后信函与随后的申请人匹配结果之间的关系

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

What was known Studies show postinterview communication from applicants may affect their placement on the program's National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) rank order list.;What is new Study finds that postinterview correspondence by applicants was not associated with position on the rank order list.;Limitations Single-program, single-specialty study limits generalizability.;Bottom line Correspondence does not benefit the applicant and can lead to misleading statements.;Introduction Communication between residency programs and applicants after interviews is common during the residency match process. In separate surveys, 86% of applicants reported being contacted by residency programs after their interview,1 and 54% to 97% of applicants sent correspondence to programs after interviews.2–4 In the context of increasing competition for residency positions, it is important to understand the effect of communication on applicants and programs. The influence of correspondence on applicants has been assessed in several surveys. In a recent multicenter survey of 564 students who participated in the 2010 Match, most reported that postinterview communication was stressful but that it also helped with their ranking decisions.1 Surveys of students applying to pediatrics, surgery, emergency medicine, and internal medicine programs have consistently demonstrated that communication from programs has led applicants to modify their rank order lists.2,5–7 Data on the effects of postinterview correspondence on residency programs is limited and conflicting. In 1 study, 57% of applicants responded that programs encouraged them to stay in touch if they were interested in matching with the program,5 suggesting program directors may be influenced by postinterview communication. However, in surveys administered by the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), program directors indicated that postinterview contact from candidates had limited importance in determining rank order when compared with applicant characteristics.8,9 To resolve the conflict and to expand the findings beyond subjective surveys, we tested the hypothesis that written postinterview correspondence from applicants to a residency program improved the applicant's position on the residency program's rank order list.;Methods Kaiser Permanente's Oakland Internal Medicine Residency is a university-affiliated, community-based program with 40 residents. The program receives more than 1000 applications per year. Interview offers are extended to applicants based on review of their Electronic Residency Application Service file. During the 2009–2010 and 2010–2011 recruitment seasons, we analyzed applicant characteristics and collected all written correspondence (e-mails or letters) from applicants to the program after their interview. Applicant Characteristics The following applicant data were included in this study: program type applied to (preliminary or categorical internal medicine); sex; past or current residency in Northern California (as an indicator of interest in the program for geographic reasons); type of graduating medical school (allopathic, osteopathic, or international); medical school rank in the U.S. News & World Report for the Match year10; Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) honor society membership; United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score (dichotomized as < 220 and ≥ 220); and core internal medicine clerkship grade. Applicants were also categorized based on whether they completed a prior rotation at the program, returned for a second look during the interview season, or participated in the couples match.;Results Applicant Characteristics A total of 470 applicants (354 categorical and 116 preliminary) interviewed at the program during the 2009–2010 and 2010–2011 recruitment seasons. Characteristics of the group included the following: 56.6% women; 8.5% AOA members; 32.7% attended medical schools ranked in the top 20 by U.S. News & World Report11; 20% rec
机译:已知的研究表明,申请人的面试后通讯可能会影响他们在该计划的国家居民匹配计划(NRMP)等级顺序列表中的排名。最新的研究发现,申请人的面试后信函与等级顺序列表上的位置无关。局限性单项计划,单项研究限制了推广性。底线通信不利于申请人,可能导致误导性陈述。简介居住权匹配过程中,居住权计划与申请人之间的沟通在面试后很常见。在单独的调查中,有86%的申请人表示在面试后与居住计划联系,1和54%至97%的申请人在面试后向计划发送了信函。2–4在对居住职位竞争日益激烈的背景下,重要的是要了解交流对申请人和计划的影响。几次调查已经评估了信函对申请人的影响。在最近对564位参加2010年比赛的学生进行的多中心调查中,大多数人称采访后交流虽然压力很大,但也有助于他们做出排名决定。1对申请儿科,外科,急诊医学和内科课程的学生的调查显示,始终表明,来自计划的沟通导致申请人修改了其排名顺序清单。2,5–7有关面试后信函对居住计划的影响的数据有限且相互矛盾。在一项研究中,有57%的申请人回答说,如果他们有兴趣与该计划相匹配,则该计划鼓励他们保持联系,5暗示该计划的负责人可能会受到面试后沟通的影响。但是,在国家居民匹配计划(NRMP)进行的调查中,计划负责人表示,与申请人的特征相比,候选人的面试后联系在确定等级顺序方面的重要性有限。8,9解决冲突并将调查结果扩展到主观之外在调查中,我们检验了以下假设:从申请人到居住计划的书面面试后信函可以提高申请人在居住计划的等级顺序列表中的位置。方法Kaiser Permanente的Oakland Internal Medicine Residency是大学附属的社区计划,有40名居民。该计划每年收到1000多个申请。面试优惠基于对电子居留申请服务文件的审核而扩展到申请人。在2009-2010年和2010-2011年的招聘季节,我们分析了申请人的特征,并在面试后收集了申请人与该计划的所有书面信函(电子邮件或信件)。申请人特征本研究包括以下申请人数据:适用的计划类型(初步或分类内科药物);性别;过去或现在在北加州的居留权(出于地理原因对该计划感兴趣)即将毕业的医学院的类型(同情,骨病或国际);比赛年美国新闻与世界报道中医学院排名10; Alpha Omega Alpha(AOA)荣誉协会会员;美国医疗执照考试(USMLE)步骤1得分(分为<220和≥220);和核心内科医师职等。申请人还根据他们是否完成了程序的先前轮换,在面试季期间返回第二视线还是参加夫妻配对而进行了分类。在2009–2010和2010–2011招聘季节的计划中。该组的特征包括:56.6%的女性; 8.5%的AOA成员; 32.7%的医学院就读于《美国新闻与世界报道》 11强的前20名;记录20%

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号