...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Effect of a Multidisciplinary-Assisted Resident Diabetes Clinic on Resident Knowledge and Patient Outcomes
【24h】

Effect of a Multidisciplinary-Assisted Resident Diabetes Clinic on Resident Knowledge and Patient Outcomes

机译:多学科辅助住院医师糖尿病诊所对住院医师知识和患者结果的影响

获取原文

摘要

Editor's Note: The online version of this article contains the Diabetes Awareness Questionnaire and Diabetes Practice Behavior Checklist used in this study.;Introduction With the escalating cost1 and prevalence of diabetes,2 more attention on diabetes management has been directed toward residents-in-training as the new primary care workforce.3 Survey studies reveal residents have negative attitudes4–6 and lack knowledge or comfort in managing diabetes.3,7–9 Lack of structured education, time constraints, and patient-faculty-resident inertia are well-cited barriers.4,10–12 Diabetes management remains suboptimal in large, university-affiliated residency programs,13,14 with 60% of patients not achieving glycated hemoglobin (A1c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or blood pressure (BP) goals.13 Studies show improved patient outcomes during the educational interventions,15–17 but few studies used multidisciplinary teaching or examined subsequent patient care by residents after intervention completion.18 The need for multidisciplinary approaches in residency education has been advocated in diabetes management.19–23 Yet, diabetes team-based teaching remains underused in residency education. Our pilot study assessed the feasibility of an innovative multidisciplinary-assisted resident diabetes clinic (MRDC) on (1) enhancing resident knowledge and subsequent practice behaviors on diabetes management before and after MRDC exposure, and (2) improving future patient and process outcomes among patients with diabetes managed by postgraduate year (PGY)-1 and PGY-2 internal medicine (IM) residents subsequently in their own continuity clinics before and after MRDC exposure.;Methods Study Design Our pilot study (October 2008 to January 2010) incorporated a formal multidisciplinary team into the preexisting, weekly resident diabetes clinic to become an innovative MRDC. Multidisciplinary team experts included certified diabetes educators, IM attendings, pharmacists, an endocrinologist, and the IM residency clinic director. This MRDC group developed a formal diabetes curriculum within the University of Florida IM residency program. The study was approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board.;Results Fourteen of 26 residents (54%) completed the study (16 were eligible [62%]; 2 [8%] were excluded due to incompletion of their MRDC rotation from back-up coverage). The MRDC residents demonstrated an increase in DAQ scores from a mean (SD) of 8.2 (2.8) pre-MRDC to 10.9 (2.8) post-MRDC (P??=??.02; Cohen d effect-size??=??0.96). Residents acquired a greater knowledge of diabetes therapy goals and insulin regimens. Examples included A1c and BP goals and the composition of 75% insulin lispro protamine suspension/25% insulin lispro injection (rDNA origin) (Humalog Mix 75/25, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN). Persistently low-scoring questions involved specific details on diabetes treatment rather than general diabetes care. Examples included carbohydrate amounts needed for hypoglycemia treatment and estimated average glucose equivalent to an A1c. The overall mean (SD) percentage of process outcomes performed on the DBPC increased from 74% (18%) before MRDC to 84% (18%) after MRDC (P??=??.004; Cohen d effect-size??=??0.55). There was a statistically significant improvement in 4 process outcomes performed: frequency of A1c checks, foot exams, diet-exercise education, and aspirin prescription (table?1). View larger version (24K) table 1Percentage of Process Outcomes Performed Before and After Exposure to the Multidisciplinary-Assisted Resident Diabetes Clinic (MRDC);Discussion Our pilot study on an innovative MRDC demonstrates modest improvements in resident knowledge and performances of certain process outcomes but had no effect on clinical outcomes in their primary care patients with diabetes. This pilot curriculum has unique and exportable features. First, its design focused on the sustainability of resident knowledge, p
机译:编者注:本文的在线版本包含本研究中使用的《糖尿病意识调查表》和《糖尿病实践行为清单》。导言随着成本1和糖尿病患病率的上升2,对糖尿病管理的更多关注已转向住院医生作为新的初级保健劳动力。3调查研究显示,居民对糖尿病的态度是消极的4-6,缺乏对糖尿病的了解或舒适感。3,7-9缺乏结构化教育,时间限制以及患者和教职员工的惯性障碍。4,10–12在大型的大学附属住院计划中,糖尿病管理仍然不理想,13,14,其中60%的患者未达到糖化血红蛋白(A1c),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)或血压(BP)目标。13研究表明,在教育干预期间患者的预后有所改善,[15-17],但很少有研究采用多学科教学或在住院后检查居民对患者的护理干预的完成。18在糖尿病管理中一直提倡在住院医师教育中采用多学科方法。19-23然而,在住院医师教育中仍未充分利用基于糖尿病团队的教学方法。我们的先导研究评估了创新的多学科辅助住院医师糖尿病诊所(MRDC)在(1)加强MRDC接触前后的居民糖尿病管理知识和后续实践行为的可行性,以及(2)改善了未来患者和患者的过程结果MRDC暴露前后,由研究生(PGY)-1和PGY-2内科药物(IM)住院的糖尿病患者随后在自己的连续性诊所就诊。方法研究设计我们的试点研究(2008年10月至2010年1月)纳入了正式研究多学科团队进入已存在的每周居住的糖尿病诊所,成为一个创新的MRDC。多学科团队的专家包括获得认证的糖尿病教育者,IM参加者,药剂师,内分泌学家和IM住院医师主任。这个MRDC小组在佛罗里达大学IM居住计划中制定了正式的糖尿病课程。研究得到佛罗里达大学机构审查委员会的批准;结果26名居民中有14名(54%)完成了研究(16名合格[62%]; 2名[8%]由于未完成MRDC轮换而被排除在外)备用保险)。 MRDC居民表现出DAQ分数从MRDC之前的8.2(2.8)的平均值(SD)增加到MRDC之后的10.9(2.8)(P ?? = ??。02; Cohen d效应大小?? ==? 0.96)。居民对糖尿病治疗目标和胰岛素治疗方案有了更多的了解。实例包括A1c和BP目标以及75%的赖脯胰岛素鱼精蛋白悬浮液/ 25%的赖脯胰岛素注射剂(rDNA来源)的组成(Humalog Mix 75/25,礼来公司(印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯))。持续得分低的问题涉及糖尿病治疗的具体细节,而不是一般的糖尿病护理。例子包括低血糖症治疗所需的碳水化合物数量和相当于A1c的估计平均葡萄糖。在DBPC上执行的过程结果的总体平均(SD)百分比从MRDC之前的74%(18%)增加到MRDC之后的84%(18%)(P ?? = ?? 0.004; Cohen d效应大小?? = ?? 0.55)。在执行的4个过程结局中,有统计学上的显着改善:A1c检查,足部检查,饮食锻炼教育和阿司匹林处方(表1)的频率。查看更大的版本(24K)表1暴露于多学科辅助的居民糖尿病诊所(MRDC)之前和之后执行的过程结果的百分比;讨论我们对创新MRDC进行的初步研究表明,居民对某些过程结果的知识和性能有适度的提高,但是对其初级保健糖尿病患者的临床结局无影响。该试验课程具有独特的可导出功能。首先,其设计着重于居民知识的可持续性,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号