首页> 外文期刊>The California Journal of Emergency Medicine >Comparison of the Efficacy of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation Versus Traditional Lecturebased Didactics in Emergency Medicine Toxicology Education
【24h】

Comparison of the Efficacy of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation Versus Traditional Lecturebased Didactics in Emergency Medicine Toxicology Education

机译:高保真患者模拟与传统基于讲座的教学方法在急诊药物毒理学教育中的功效比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: High fidelity patient simulation (SIM) hasbeen gaining widespread use in medical education. Evidenceregarding advantages in both knowledge retention and learnersatisfaction is growing. There is scant data pertaining toinstruction in toxicology, where SIM is particularly appealing.Objectives: We compared two models of toxicologyeducation - one involving simulated toxicology cases, and the other using a more traditional, lecture-based approach, withan effort to determine the efficacy of patient simulation inEmergency Medicine Toxicology education.Methods: DESIGN - Prospective, randomized studycomparing performance on pre- and post-test within a specificeducation modality. A satisfaction survey was used to assessthe participants’ subjective experience with the SIM cases.SETTING -The study was conducted at a large academicinstitution with a Toxicology consult service. PARTICIPANTS- Residents and medical students rotating through thetoxicology department at a single academic institution, overone academic year.INTERVENTIONS/OBSERVATIONS - Three toxicologycases were presented during a month-long rotation using eitherthe SIM- or lecture-based format. For each case, participantswere randomized to one of two learner groups, varying by theteaching modality applied. Knowledge gained was quantifiedby comparing their performance on pre- and post-test writtenassessments. Improvements in scores of the SIM group werecompared to those of the lecture group. A survey assessing theparticipants’ subjective experience in the SIM cases was sent.Results: A total of 22 rotators participated in the learningmodules, of which 14b completed the pre-and post-tests fordata collection. There was no statistical difference in pre-testscores (mean 2.62 points, p=0.43, 95% CI of -9.35 to 4.11)amongst the 2 groups. There was significant improvementin scores after both learning modalities (SIM: mean 17.21,p=0.0016, 95% CI of 7.3-27.08; Lecture: mean 9.72,p=0.0016, 95%CI of 3.9-15.5). The SIM group experienceda higher jump in their scores, compared to the lecture group(mean 10.08, p=0.0057, 95% CI 3.27-16.9). Five participantsresponded to the satisfaction survey and all felt thatparticipation in SIM improved their confidence, engagement,and clinical knowledge.Conclusions: While both the SIM- and lecture-basedformat improved toxicology knowledge, the SIM modalitywas more effective. This pilot study suggests that SIM can bea useful educational tool in toxicology education.
机译:背景:高保真患者模拟(SIM)已在医学教育中得到广泛使用。关于知识保留和学习者满意度方面优势的证据正在增长。目的:我们比较了两种毒理学教育模型-一种涉及模拟毒理学案例,另一种则采用了更为传统的基于演讲的方法,旨在确定毒理学的有效性方法:设计-前瞻性随机研究,比较在特定教育方式下测试前和测试后的表现。满意度调查被用来评估参与者对SIM病例的主观体验。背景-这项研究是在一家大型毒理学咨询服务机构中进行的。参加者-居民和医学生在一个学年内在同一学术机构的毒理学部门轮换。干预/观察-在一个月的轮换中,使用基于SIM或基于讲座的格式介绍了三个毒理学案例。对于每种情况,将参与者随机分为两个学习者组之一,具体取决于所采用的教学方式。通过比较他们在测试前和测试后书面评估中的表现来量化获得的知识。 SIM组的分数提高与演讲组的分数相比有所提高。结果:共有22位轮岗学员参加了学习模块,其中14b位完成了数据收集的前测和后测。两组之间的前测成绩无统计学差异(平均2.62分,p = 0.43,95%CI为-9.35至4.11)。两种学习方式后的得分都有显着改善(SIM:平均17.21,p = 0.0016,95%CI为7.3-27.08;讲座:平均9.72,p = 0.0016,95%CI为3.9-15.5)。与演讲组相比,SIM组的得分有更高的提高(平均10.08,p = 0.0057,95%CI 3.27-16.9)。五名参与者进行了满意度调查,所有人都认为参加SIM卡可以提高他们的信心,参与度和临床知识。结论:虽然SIM和基于讲座的格式都可以提高毒理学知识,但SIM方式更为有效。这项初步研究表明,SIM可以成为毒理学教育中的一种有用的教育工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号