首页> 外文期刊>Universal Journal of Applied Science >Scale Development of Teachers' Sense Meaning at Work in Taiwan—From the Perspective of Workplace Spirituality
【24h】

Scale Development of Teachers' Sense Meaning at Work in Taiwan—From the Perspective of Workplace Spirituality

机译:从工作场所精神角度看台湾教师工作意义意义的规模发展

获取原文
           

摘要

For the importance of developing people’s potential in working, the study aims to develop the scale of meaning sense at work. Three steps are adopted: 1. Literature analysis: with foreign research analysis of EFA, it revealed that Spirituality at Work can be classified into 3 levels, including the individual, the group, and the organization level. From Milliman, Czaplewski, and Ferguson's perspective, the individual level explores sense of meaning at work, including energy obtained from work, the enjoyable work, and the meaning that work endows the individual. At this point, the research integrate the aspects of the individual scales of spirituality at work as sense of attraction at work, sense of pleasure at work, and sense of inner life. 2. Expert review: After consulting the items of scale of spirituality at work, we proposed the draft of 13-item Three Factor Questionnaire. Then, the questionnaire was reviewed and modified by three university scholars who had published paper or books regarding spirituality to provide us their comment for further modification. Subsequently, a senior high school teacher with consultation and life education major offered us practical opinions at the education site. Finally, one item was deleted, 6 items' terms were modified, and 6 remained the same. 3. CFA: This part is categorized into three models. (1) The initial model: the 12 items of Three Factors were edited as 5 point scale. After investigating 235 teachers, we conducted the first-order CFA model to verify the fitness. The results of the overall model are fairly appropriate. However, the factor load of "I often forget time for teaching or processing administrative matters" is .29, so we deleted this item. (2) The modification model: The model after deleting the item is called the modification model, and the results are fairly appropriate. With further analyzing the basic fit of the modification model, it is found that there is no offending estimation. The fit of the internal structure is acceptable (including individual reliability, composite reliability, the average variation extraction, and construct discrimination). 3. The cross-validity model: since the model had been modified, we investigated another batch of samples (N=378) to confirm the stability of the model. The overall results are fairly appropriate. Here, the three factor teacher's sense of meaning at work with 11 items are set up; that is, the three factor teacher's sense of meaning at work with 11 items is supported, which is classified into sense of attraction at work (4 items), sense of pleasure at work (4 items), and sense of inner life (3 items).
机译:为了提高人们在工作中的潜力,该研究旨在扩大工作中的意义感。采取三个步骤:1.文献分析:通过对全民教育的国外研究分析,发现工作中的精神性可以分为个人,团体和组织三个层次。从Milliman,Czaplewski和Ferguson的角度来看,个人层面探索工作中的意义,包括从工作中获得的能量,愉快的工作以及赋予工作的意义。在这一点上,研究将工作中的灵性个体尺度的方面整合为工作中的吸引力感,工作中的愉悦感和内心生活感。 2.专家审查:在咨询了工作中的灵性规模后,我们提出了13项三因素问卷调查表的草案。然后,由三位大学学者发表了有关灵性的论文或书籍,对问卷进行了审查和修改,以期为我们提供进一步修改的意见。随后,一位具有咨询和生活教育专业的高中老师在教育现场为我们提供了实用的意见。最后,删除了一项,修改了6个项目的术语,而6个保持不变。 3. CFA:这部分分为三个模型。 (1)初始模型:将三因素的12个项目编辑为5分制。在对235名教师进行调查之后,我们进行了一阶CFA模型来验证适合度。总体模型的结果是相当合适的。但是,“我经常忘记教或处理行政事务的时间”的因素负荷为0.29,因此我们删除了此项目。 (2)修改模型:删除项目后的模型称为修改模型,其结果相当合适。通过进一步分析修改模型的基本拟合,发现没有违规估计。内部结构的配合是可以接受的(包括个人可靠性,复合材料可靠性,平均变异提取和构造区分)。 3.交叉验证模型:由于对模型进行了修改,我们对另一批样本(N = 378)进行了研究,以确认模型的稳定性。总体结果是相当合适的。在这里,建立了三要素教师在进行11项工作时的意义感;即,支持三项因素的教师在工作中的意义感(11项)分为工作吸引力(4项),工作愉悦感(4项)和内心感(3项)。 )。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号