Scientific Creativity in Psychiatry

Ronald W. Pies MD

首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatric Times >Scientific Creativity in Psychiatry

【24h】

Scientific Creativity in Psychiatry

机译：精神病学中的科学创造力

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Readers of Albert Rothenberg’s new book will come away greatly enriched by the author’s own lifelong, creative synthesis.

机译：艾伯特·罗滕贝格（Albert Rothenberg）的新书的读者将因作者一生的创新创造而大大丰富。

著录项

来源
《Psychiatric Times》 |2015年第2015期|共页
作者
Ronald W. Pies MD;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类农业科学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Perspectives of Science Teacher Candidates Regarding Scientific Creativity, And Their Ability to Reflect Scientific Creativity in Their Education [J] . Sibel Demir Research on Humanities and Social Sciences . 2015,第12期

机译：科学教师候选人关于科学创造力的观点及其在教育中反映科学创造力的能力
2. Assessment of Prospective Science Teachers’ Metacognition and Creativity Perceptions and Scientific Toys in Terms of Scientific Creativity [J] . Sibel Demir, Fatma ?ahin Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences . 2014,第2期

机译：根据科学创造力评估准科学老师的元认知和创造力感知以及科学玩具
3. Promoting a mixed-design model of scientific creativity through digital storytelling—the CCQ model for creativity [J] . Zacharoula Smyrnaiou, Eleni Georgakopoulou, Sofoklis Sotiriou International Journal of STEM Education . 2020,第1期

机译：通过数字讲故事 - CCQ模型推进科学创造力的混合设计模型 - 用于创造力
4. Enrich classifications in psychiatry with textual data: an ontology for psychiatry including social concepts [C] . Marion RICHARD, Xavier AIME, Marie-Odile KREBS, Medical Informatics in Europe Conference. . 2015

机译：丰富文本数据的精神病学分类：精神病学的本体论包括社会概念
5. Scientific psychiatry in Stalin's Soviet Union: The politics of modern medicine and the struggle to define 'Pavlovian' psychiatry, 1939--1953. [D] . Zajicek, Benjamin. 2009

机译：斯大林苏联的科学精神病学：现代医学政治与界定“巴甫洛夫式”精神病学的斗争，1939--1953年。
6. The Relation of Scientific Creativity and Evaluation of Scientific Impact to Scientific Reasoning and General Intelligence [O] . Robert J. Sternberg, Rebel J. E. Todhunter, Aaron Litvak, 2020

机译：科学创造力与科学推理与普通情报对科学影响的关系
7. We develop a model of scientific creativity and test it in the field of rare diseases. Our model is based on the results of an in-depth case study of the Rett syndrome. Archival analysis, bibliometric techniques and expert surveys are combined with network analysis to identify the most creative scientists. First, alternative measures of generative and combinatorial creativity are compared. Then, we generalize our results and present a stochastic model of socio-semantic network evolution. The model predictions are tested with multiple networks of rare disease specialties. We find that new scientific collaborations among experts in a field enhance combinatorial creativity. Instead, high entry rates of novices are negatively related to generative creativity. By extending the set of useful concepts, creative scientists gain in centrality. At the same time, by increasing their centrality in the scientific community, scientists can replicate and generalize their results, thus contributing to a scientific paradigm. [O] . Massimo Riccaboni, Maria Laura Frigotto 100

机译：我们开发了一种科学创造力模型，并在稀有疾病领域进行测试。我们的模型基于对Rett综合征的深入案例研究的结果。档案分析，文献计量技术和专家调查与网络分析相结合，以确定最具创造力的科学家。首先，比较生成和组合创造力的替代措施。然后，我们推广了我们的结果，并提出了社会语义网络演化的随机模型。模型预测用多个罕见疾病专业网络进行测试。我们发现，一个领域的专家之间的新的科学合作增强了组合创造力。相反，新手的高入门率与生成创造力负相关。通过扩展这组有用的概念，创造性的科学家获得了中心地位。同时，通过增加科学界的中心地位，科学家们可以复制和推广他们的结果，从而促进科学范式的发展。

Scientific Creativity in Psychiatry

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅