首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacognosy magazine >Morphological and Chemoprofile (Liquid Chromatography-mass Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography-mass Spectroscopy) Comparisons of Cyperus scariosus R. Br and Cyperus rotundus L.
【24h】

Morphological and Chemoprofile (Liquid Chromatography-mass Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography-mass Spectroscopy) Comparisons of Cyperus scariosus R. Br and Cyperus rotundus L.

机译:莎草(Cyperusscariosus R.Br)和香附子香附子(Cyperus rotundus L.)的形态和化学特征(液相色谱-质谱和气相色谱-质谱)比较。

获取原文

摘要

Background: Cyperus scariosus (CS) R.Br and Cyperus rotundus (CR) L. belongs to Cyperaceae family which is well-reputed in the traditional systems of medicine. Although they grow in different agro-climatic conditions, they are often considered to be synonymous with each other. Objective: The present study was aimed to systematically classify both the species CS and CR through their morphological features and chemical profiling using liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS), gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) and thin layer chromatography patterns of the rhizome extracts. Materials and Methods: A method (LC-MS analysis) has been developed on Agilent LC-MSD Trap SL mass spectrometer equipped with Waters HR C18 column (3.9 mm × 300 mm, 6 μm) using isocratic elution with acetonitrile and water (70:30% v/v ratio). GC-MS analysis was performed on a Shimadzu GC-MS-QP 2010 equipped with DB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm). Results: Chemoprofiling of CS and CR using LC-MS and GC-MS suggested that these two are different based on their deferential spectral pattern, however, some of the common peaks were found in both the species. In addition, we also performed the preliminary phytochemical investigation of hexane and chloroform extracts of these species, which led to the isolation of stigmasterol, β-sitosterol and lupeol as major constituents in CS. Conclusion: In summary, we have developed optimal chromatographic conditions (LC-MS and GC-MS) and morphological profiles to classify both the species, that is, CS and CR. Collectively, our analytical results coupled with the morphological data clearly suggested that CS and CR are morphologically different. SUMMARY The huge demand for herbal medicine has put pressure on the supply of natural resources which ultimately results in use of substandard materials or substitution and adulteration. The medicinal plants, Cyperus rotundus L and Cyperus scariosus R.Br which belongs to cyperaceae family and extensively used in the traditional systems of medicine. Although these two species are grown in different soil conditions, Cyperus scariosus R.Br often treated as synonymous of Cyperus rotundus . Thus, the present study was undertaken to classify these two species systematically using the modern analytical techniques as a powerful tools. Further, we also carried out the preliminary phytochemical investigation of hexane and chloroform extracts of cyperus scariosus rhizomes, which resulted in the isolation of three compounds namely Sitosterol, Stigmasterol and Lupeol.
机译:背景:莎草(Cyperus scariosus)(CS)R.Br和圆形莎草(Cyperus rotundus(CR)L.)属于莎草科(Cyperaceae),在传统医学系统中声誉卓著。尽管它们在不同的农业气候条件下生长,但它们通常被视为彼此的同义词。目的:本研究旨在通过使用液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS),气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)和薄层色谱模式通过形态特征和化学分析对CS和CR物种进行系统分类根茎提取物。材料和方法:已在配备Waters HR C18色谱柱(3.9 mm×300 mm,6μm)的Agilent LC-MSD Trap SL质谱仪上开发了一种方法(LC-MS分析),采用乙腈和水等度洗脱(70: 30%v / v比)。在配备DB-5毛细管柱(30 m×0.25 mm×0.25μm)的Shimadzu GC-MS-QP 2010上进行GC-MS分析。结果:使用LC-MS和GC-MS对CS和CR进行化学分析表明,这两种方法基于它们的差分光谱图谱是不同的,但是,在这两个物种中都发现了一些共同的峰。此外,我们还对这些物种的己烷和氯仿提取物进行了初步的植物化学研究,从而分离了豆甾醇,β-谷甾醇和羽扇豆酚作为CS中的主要成分。结论:总而言之,我们已经开发了最佳色谱条件(LC-MS和GC-MS)和形态学图谱,以对这两个物种(即CS和CR)进行分类。总的来说,我们的分析结果与形态数据清楚地表明CS和CR在形态上是不同的。发明内容对草药的巨大需求对自然资源的供应施加了压力,这最终导致使用不合格材料或替代和掺假。属于莎草科的药用植物香附子L(Cyperus rotundus L)和香附子Cyperusscariosus R.Br广泛用于传统医学体系中。尽管这两个物种在不同的土壤条件下生长,但是常被视为香附子的同义词。因此,本研究进行了使用现代分析技术作为有力工具对这两个物种进行系统分类。此外,我们还对香附子根茎的己烷和氯仿提取物进行了初步的植物化学研究,从而分离出了三种化合物,即谷甾醇,豆固醇和卢贝醇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号