...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient Safety in Surgery >Risk adjustment is crucial in comparing outcomes of various surgical modalities in patients with ileal perforation
【24h】

Risk adjustment is crucial in comparing outcomes of various surgical modalities in patients with ileal perforation

机译:风险调整对于比较回肠穿孔患者各种手术方式的结果至关重要

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Using crude mortality and morbidity rates for comparing outcomes can be misleading. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcome of various surgical modalities without and with risk adjustment using Physiologic and Operative Severity Scoring for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) score in cases of ileal perforations. Methods Prospective study on 125 patients of ileal perforations. Resection anastamosis (Group I) was done in 38 patients, primary repair (Group II) in 42 patients and 45 patients had an ileostomy (Group III). The disease severity was assessed in all patients using POSSUM score. The odds of death without and with risk adjustment using POSSUM mortality score were calculated for all groups Results Seventeen patients (14%) patients died and 99 (79%) developed postoperative complications. Using crude mortality rates Group I appeared to be the best treatment option with only 2 (5%) deaths followed by Group II with 5 (12%) deaths where as Group III had the worst outcome with 10 deaths (22%). However, Group III (ileostomy) patients had higher mean POSSUM mortality and morbidity score (55.55%, 91.33%) than Group I (28%, 75.26%) and Group II (27%, 73.59%). Taking Group I as the reference (odds ratio, OR1) odds of death were greatest in Group III (OR 5.14, p = 0.043) followed by Group II (OR 2.43, p = 0.306). With risk adjustment using POSSUM mortality score the odds of death decreased in Group III (OR 1.16 p = 0.875). For the whole group, there was a significant association between the POSSUM score and postoperative complications and deaths. Mean POSSUM mortality and morbidity score of those who died (63.40 vs.33.68, p = 0.001) and developed complications (66.32 vs.84.20, p = 0.001) was significantly higher. For every percent increase in severity score the risk of postoperative complications and death increased by 1.10 (p = 0.001) and1.06 (p = 0.001) respectively. Conclusion Despite ileostomy patients having highest crude mortality and complication rates, after risk adjustment it was equally safe. Severity of the disease rather than the surgical option had a significant impact on the outcome in patients with ileal perforations.
机译:背景使用粗死亡率和发病率比较结果可能会产生误导。本研究的目的是比较在使用回肠穿孔的情况下使用生理和手术严重程度评分进行死亡率和发病率评分(POSSUM)的各种手术方式在不进行和进行风险调整的情况下的结果。方法对125例回肠穿孔患者进行前瞻性研究。切除吻合术(组I)38例,一次修复(组II)42例,有45例行回肠造口术(组III)。使用POSSUM评分评估所有患者的疾病严重程度。计算所有组在没有和有风险的情况下使用POSSUM死亡率评分的死亡几率。结果17例患者(14%)死亡,99例(79%)发生术后并发症。使用粗死亡率,第一组似乎是最好的治疗选择,只有2(5%)例死亡,其次是第二组,有5(12%)例死亡,而第三组的结果最差,有10例(22%)。但是,第三组(回肠造口术)患者的平均POSSUM死亡率和发病率得分(55.55%,91.33%)高于第一组(28%,75.26%)和第二组(27%,73.59%)。以第一组为基准(赔率,OR1),第三组的死亡几率最大(OR 5.14,p = 0.043),第二组的死亡几率最高(OR 2.43,p = 0.306)。使用POSSUM死亡率评分进行风险调整后,第三组的死亡几率降低了(OR 1.16 p = 0.875)。对于整个组,POSSUM评分与术后并发症和死亡之间存在显着关联。死亡(63.40 vs.33.68,p = 0.001)和发生并发症(66.32 vs.84.20,p = 0.001)的患者的平均POSSUM死亡率和发病率评分显着更高。严重度评分每提高百分之一,术后并发症和死亡的风险分别增加1.10(p = 0.001)和1.06(p = 0.001)。结论尽管回肠造口术患者的粗死亡率和并发症发生率最高,但在风险调整后,它同样安全。疾病的严重程度而不是手术选择对回肠穿孔患者的结局有重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号