...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Science >First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: Comparison of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Allograft versus Autogenous Bone Graft Fusion Rates
【24h】

First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: Comparison of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Allograft versus Autogenous Bone Graft Fusion Rates

机译:第一Meta趾关节关节固定术:间充质干细胞同种异体移植与自体骨移植融合率的比较。

获取原文

摘要

With patients undergoing first time 1st metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using graft material when it was required to fill cystic bone voids, we retrospectively compared the time to fusion (clinical and radiographic), and non-union rate between the patient’s own bone autograft (n = 62) versus a mesenchymal stem cell impregnated allograft group (n = 51). A third control group (n = 52) was included in which an end-to-end arthrodesis was performed and no graft interposition was used or necessary. The non-union rate was 4% (n = 2) in the control group, 5.9% (n = 4) in the autograft group, and 9.5% (n = 5) in the mesenchymal stem cell allograft group. The time for radiographic fusion was 6.46 weeks for the control group, 6.52 weeks for the autograft group, and 6.53 weeks for the mesenchymal stem cell allograft group. The difference in time to clinical and radiographic union and the non-union rate were not found to be statistically significant among all 3 groups. Patient comorbidities and their possible effects on union rates were also analyzed within the populations. Some comorbidities had statistically significantly non-unions within the population, notably smoking (p = 0.024) and Rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.001), however the populations were fairly small. The use of allogeneic bone graft impregnated with mesenchymal stem cells yields a similar fusion rate as with the use of autologous bone graft harvested from the surrounding area. The allograft impregnated with mesenchymal stem cells is a viable alternative yielding similar results when local autogenous bone graft is not available, not obtainable, or conditions warrant its use.
机译:当患者需要填充囊性骨空隙时首次使用移植物进行第一次1趾关节固定术时,我们回顾性比较了融合时间(临床和影像学检查)以及患者自身骨自体移植之间的不愈合率(n = 62) )与间充质干细胞浸润的同种异体移植组(n = 51)。包括第三个对照组(n = 52),其中进行了端到端关节固定术,并且没有使用或没有必要进行移植物干预。对照组的不愈合率为4%(n = 2),自体移植组为5.9%(n = 4),间充质干细胞同种异体移植组的不愈合率为9.5%(n = 5)。对照组的放射线照相融合时间为6.46周,自体移植组为6.52周,间充质干细胞同种异体移植组为6.53周。在所有3组中,发现临床和X线摄影结合时间的差异以及不愈合率差异均无统计学意义。在人群中还分析了患者合并症及其对合并率的可能影响。统计学上,合并症在人群中有明显的不合,尤其是吸烟(p = 0.024)和类风湿关节炎(p = 0.001),但是人群很小。使用浸有间充质干细胞的同种异体骨移植物产生的融合率与使用从周围区域收获的自体骨移植物相似。当局部自体骨移植物不可用,无法获得或条件允许使用时,用间充质干细胞浸渍的同种异体移植物是可行的选择,可产生相似的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号