...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology >Accuracy of invasive and noninvasive methods of Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis in Saudi children
【24h】

Accuracy of invasive and noninvasive methods of Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis in Saudi children

机译:沙特阿拉伯儿童有创和无创幽门螺杆菌感染诊断方法的准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/Aim: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is one of the most common chronic infections in the world. The prevalence of H. pylori is high in Saudi Arabia, but there are no studies in children on the accuracy of invasive and noninvasive methods to diagnose H. pylori infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of six methods for diagnosis of H. pylori infection; four invasive [rapid urease test (RUT), histology, antral nodularity (AD), and biopsy culture (BC)] and two noninvasive methods [serologic test and stool antigen test (SAT)]. Patients and Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed among symptomatic children in National Guard hospitals who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy from 2010 to 2013. The gold standard diagnosis of H. pylori was positive tissue culture. If the culture was unsuccessful or not done, concordant-positive results for histology and RUT were considered to indicate a positive H. pylori. The variables analyzed as diagnostic methods included RUT, BC, histology, AD, serologic test, and SAT. Results: A total of 303 children were included in the study. The overall prevalence of H. pylori infection was 49.8%. Most diagnostic tests showed high specificity and moderate-to-low sensitivity when compared to the gold standard test. Sensitivity of AD, SAT, and RUT to detect H. pylori were 62% (95% CI: 0.51–0.74), 69% (95% CI: 0.58–0.79), and 87% (95% CI: 0.79–0.95), respectively (P value 0.040, 0.0023, and 0.0001, respectively). RUT showed the lowest specificity, 65% (95% CI: 0.58–0.71) in contrast to BC and histology which showed moderate-to-high specificities of 88% (95% CI: 0.82–0.95) and 89% (95% CI: 0.82–0.95), respectively (P 0.0001). Conclusion: RUT is a valuable diagnostic method for identifying H. pylori with the highest sensitivity compared to AD and SAT. All diagnostic tests showed moderate-to-high specificities but BC and histology showed the highest specificity.
机译:背景/目的:幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)感染是世界上最常见的慢性感染之一。幽门螺杆菌在沙特阿拉伯的患病率很高,但是尚无儿童研究侵入性和非侵入性方法诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的准确性。这项研究的目的是评估诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的六种方法的准确性。四种侵入性[快速尿素酶试验(RUT),组织学,肛门结节(AD)和活组织检查培养(BC)]和两种非侵入性方法[血清学试验和粪便抗原试验(SAT)]。患者和方法:前卫横断面研究是对2010年至2013年接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查的国民警卫队有症状儿童进行的。幽门螺杆菌的金标准诊断为阳性组织培养。如果培养不成功或未完成,则组织学和RUT的一致阳性结果被认为表明幽门螺杆菌阳性。作为诊断方法分析的变量包括RUT,BC,组织学,AD,血清学检查和SAT。结果:总共303名儿童被纳入研究。幽门螺杆菌感染的总体患病率为49.8%。与金标准测试相比,大多数诊断测试显示出高特异性和中等到低灵敏度。 AD,SAT和RUT检测幽门螺杆菌的敏感性分别为62%(95%CI:0.51-0.74),69%(95%CI:0.58-0.79)和87%(95%CI:0.79-0.95) ,分别(P值分别为0.040、0.0023和<0.0001)。 RUT的特异性最低,为65%(95%CI:0.58–0.71),而BC和组织学则显示中至高的特异性分别为88%(95%CI:0.82-0.95)和89%(95%CI) :0.82-0.95)(P <0.0001)。结论:与AD和SAT相比,RUT是一种最有价值的诊断幽门螺杆菌的诊断方法。所有诊断测试均显示中度至高特异性,但BC和组织学显示最高特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号