首页> 外文期刊>Open Glycoscience >The Quantification of Glycosaminoglycans: A Comparison of HPLC, Carbazole, and Alcian Blue Methods/title>
【24h】

The Quantification of Glycosaminoglycans: A Comparison of HPLC, Carbazole, and Alcian Blue Methods/title>

机译:糖胺聚糖的定量:HPLC,咔唑和阿尔辛蓝方法的比较/ title>

获取原文
       

摘要

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are linear polysaccharides that are found in the extracellular matrix and biologicalfluids of animals where they interact with hundreds of proteins and perform a variety of critical roles. There are fiveclasses of animal GAGs: heparan sulfate (HS), chondroitin sulfate (CS), dermatan sulfate (DS), keratan sulfate (KS), andhyaluronan (HA). Many biological functions can be monitored directly by their impact on GAG quantity. Thus, simple,sensitive, and robust GAG quantification methods are needed for the development of biomarkers. We have systematicallycompared three available GAG quantification assays including an HPLC-based assay, a simplified Alcian Blue assay, anda miniaturized carbazole assay. The carbazole and Alcian Blue assays were reproducible and simple to perform in generallab settings, but had important limitations: The carbazole assay could not detect KS and it overestimated GAGs that werecontaminated with salts or dissolved in PBS. The Alcian Blue assay detected only those GAGs that were sulfated. In contrast,while the HPLC method was time-consuming, it was a robust and sensitive assay that not only detected all GAGsbut also quantified glucosamine-GAGs and galactosamine-GAGs simultaneously. The HPLC assay was not affected bysalt or level of GAG sulfation and it yielded reproducible values for all types of GAGs tested. These results suggest thatan automated HPLC assay would be generally useful for the routine measurement of a panel of GAG-based biomarkerswhile the carbazole assay and the Alcian Blue assays could prove valuable for more specific purposes.
机译:糖胺聚糖(GAG)是线性多糖,存在于动物的细胞外基质和生物流体中,它们与数百种蛋白质相互作用并发挥多种关键作用。动物GAG有五类:硫酸乙酰肝素(HS),硫酸软骨素(CS),硫酸皮肤素(DS),硫酸角质素(KS)和透明质酸(HA)。许多生物功能可以通过其对GAG量的影响来直接监控。因此,需要简单,灵敏且可靠的GAG定量方法来开发生物标记。我们系统地比较了三种可用的GAG定量分析,包括基于HPLC的分析,简化的Alcian Blue分析和小型化咔唑分析。咔唑和Alcian Blue分析的重现性强,在一般实验室环境下操作简便,但存在重要局限性:咔唑分析无法检测KS,并且高估了被盐污染或溶于PBS的GAG。 Alcian Blue分析仅检测到被硫酸化的GAG。相比之下,虽然HPLC方法费时,但它是一种强大而灵敏的测定方法,它不仅可以检测所有GAG,而且可以同时定量检测葡萄糖胺-GAG和半乳糖胺-GAG。 HPLC测定不受盐或GAG硫酸盐含量的影响,对于所有测试类型的GAG,它都能产生可重复的值。这些结果表明,自动HPLC分析通常可用于常规检测一组基于GAG的生物标志物,而咔唑分析和Alcian Blue分析可能证明对更具体的目的有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号