首页> 外文期刊>Language Testing in Asia >Developing a scoring rubric for L2 summary writing: a hybrid approach combining analytic and holistic assessment
【24h】

Developing a scoring rubric for L2 summary writing: a hybrid approach combining analytic and holistic assessment

机译:开发用于L2摘要写作的评分标准:结合分析和整体评估的混合方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Background In our research project, we have developed a scoring rubric for a second language (L2) summary writing for English as a foreign language (EFL) students in Japanese universities. This study aimed to examine the applicability of our five-dimensional rubric, which features both analytic and holistic assessments, to classrooms in the EFL context. The examination especially focused on a newly added, optional overall quality dimension and two paraphrasing dimensions: paraphrase (quantity) and paraphrase (quality). Methods Six teacher raters evaluated 16 summaries written by Japanese EFL university student writers using our new rubric. The scoring results were quantitatively compared with the scoring results of a commonly used rubric developed by the Educational Testing Service (ETS). For the qualitative examination, the teacher raters’ retrospective comments on our five-dimensional rubric were analyzed. Results The quantitative examination demonstrated positive results as follows: (a) adding the optional overall quality dimension improved the reliability of our rubric, (b) the overall quality dimension worked well even if it was used alone, (c) our rubric and the ETS holistic rubric overlapped moderately as L2 summary writing assessments, and (d) the two paraphrasing dimensions covered similar but different aspects of paraphrasing. However, the quantitative analysis using the generalizability theory (G theory) simulated that the reliability (generalizability coefficients) of the rubric was not high when the number of raters decreased. The qualitative examination of the raters’ perceptions of our rubric generally confirmed the quantitative results. Conclusion This study confirmed the applicability of our rubric to EFL classrooms. This new type of rating scale can be characterized as a “hybrid” approach that offers the user a choice of analytic and holistic measures depending on individual purposes, which can enhance teachers’ explicit instructions.
机译:背景信息在我们的研究项目中,我们为日本大学的英语作为外语(EFL)学生开发了第二语言(L2)摘要写作的计分规则。这项研究旨在检验我们的五维专栏在分析EFL语境中的适用性,该专栏以分析和整体评估为特色。考试的重点尤其是新增的,可选的整体质量维度和两个释义维度:复述(数量)和复述(质量)。方法六名教师评价者使用我们的新标题对日本EFL大学学生作家撰写的16篇摘要进行了评估。将评分结果与教育测试服务(ETS)开发的常用专栏评分结果进行定量比较。对于定性检查,分析了教师评分者对我们的五维主题的回顾性评论。结果定量检查显示出以下积极结果:(a)添加可选的整体质量维度提高了我们的评分标准的可靠性,(b)整体质量维度即使单独使用也运行良好,(c)我们的评分标准和ETS在第二级总结写作评估中,整体的标题适度重叠,并且(d)两个释义维度涵盖了相似但不同的释义方面。但是,使用概化理论(G理论)进行的定量分析模拟表明,评分者数量减少时,评分标准的可靠性(概化系数)不高。对评级者对我们的评分标准的看法进行的定性检查总体上证实了定量结果。结论这项研究证实了我们的规则适用于EFL教室。这种新型的评分量表可以被描述为一种“混合”方法,可以根据个人目的为用户提供分析和整体测量的选择,从而可以增强教师的明确指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号