首页> 外文期刊>Microbiology Education Journal >Comparing Outdated and Updated Textbook Figures Helps Introduce Undergraduates to Primary Literature ?
【24h】

Comparing Outdated and Updated Textbook Figures Helps Introduce Undergraduates to Primary Literature ?

机译:比较过时和更新过的教科书中的数字是否可以帮助将本科生介绍给初级文学?

获取原文
           

摘要

Many of the didactic tools used in the undergraduate classroom, including textbooks, often highlight science as a body of knowledge, presenting learners with a field’s current “up-to-date” understanding of a subject. It is important that students grasp the idea that this body of knowledge is not static, but evolving through a process by which scientists continually test, revise, and build upon that knowledge. Science as a process is best highlighted in the primary scientific literature. In the context of the undergraduate classroom, we have used side-by-side comparison of old and updated textbook figures to introduce 200- and 300-level Genetics students to the field as a dynamic area of scientific inquiry. We also use this exercise as an opportunity to introduce students to relevant primary literature. We find that this is an effective way to transition students from their textbook to primary literature as a source of information.
机译:本科课堂上使用的许多教学工具(包括教科书)通常都将科学作为一种知识体系加以强调,向学习者展示该领域对某一主题的当前“最新”理解。重要的是,学生必须掌握这样的观念,即知识体系不是一成不变的,而是通过科学家不断地测试,修改和建立该知识的过程演变而来的。在主要的科学文献中,科学是一个过程的最佳体现。在本科教室的背景下,我们通过对旧的和更新的教科书数字进行并排比较,向200和300级遗传学学生介绍了该领域,将其作为动态的科学探究领域。我们还将以此为契机,向学生介绍相关的主要文献。我们发现这是将学生从其教科书过渡到主要文献作为信息来源的有效途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号