首页> 外文期刊>Medical science monitor : >Diagnostic Value of Conventional Ultrasonography Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 3 and 4 Thyroid Micronodules
【24h】

Diagnostic Value of Conventional Ultrasonography Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 3 and 4 Thyroid Micronodules

机译:常规超声检查与超声造影对比对甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)3和4甲状腺微结节的诊断价值

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND The present study was conducted to investigate the diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasonography (US) combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in thyroid micronodules with thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) category 3 and 4. MATERIAL AND METHODS The features of conventional US and CEUS ion 102 case of thyroid micronodule samples, which were diagnosed based on pathological and clinical examination, were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the diagnostic accuracy in malignant thyroid micronodules. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the performance of those 2 technologies. RESULTS A significant difference in age was found between the benign and malignant groups. The benign and malignant groups showed significant differences in shape, margin, aspect ratio (A/T) ≥1, microcalcification, suspicious lymph gland, enhancement time, enhancement pattern, enhancement intensity, nodule sizes, enhancement margins, and rim-like enhancement. Logistic regression analysis of conventional US showed that A/T ≥1, irregular shape, microcalcification, and suspicious lymph glands are risk factors for thyroid micronodules, while logistic regression analysis of CEUS showed that slow enhancement time and absence of rim-like enhancement are risk factors for thyroid micronodules. Logistic regression analysis of conventional US combined with CEUS demonstrated that A/T ≥1, microcalcification, suspicious lymph gland, slow enhancement time, and absence with rim-like enhancement are risk factors. The ROC curve for conventional US, CEUS, and conventional US combined with CEUS were 90.0%, 90.7%, 99.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that conventional US combined with CEUS had superior diagnostic performance for TI-RADS 3 and 4 thyroid micronodules compared with conventional US and CEUS alone.
机译:背景技术本研究旨在探讨常规超声检查(US)与对比增强超声检查(CEUS)在甲状腺微小结节(甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)第3和第4类)中的诊断性能。回顾性分析经病理和临床检查诊断的常规US和CEUS离子102例甲状腺微结节样本的特征。 Logistic回归分析用于分析甲状腺恶性微小结节的诊断准确性。接收者操作员特征(ROC)曲线用于评估这两种技术的性能。结果发现良性和恶性组之间的年龄存在显着差异。良性和恶性组在形状,边缘,长宽比(A / T)≥1,微钙化,可疑淋巴腺,增强时间,增强模式,增强强度,结节大小,增强边缘和边缘样增强方面显示出显着差异。常规US的Logistic回归分析显示A / T≥1,形状不规则,微钙化和可疑淋巴腺是甲状腺微结节的危险因素,而CEUS的Logistic回归分析显示缓慢的增强时间和缺乏边缘样增强的风险甲状腺微小结节的因素。常规US结合CEUS的Logistic回归分析表明,A / T≥1,微钙化,可疑淋巴腺,增强时间缓慢以及缺乏边缘样增强是危险因素。常规美国,CEUS和常规美国与CEUS的ROC曲线分别为90.0%,90.7%,99.0%。结论我们的结果表明,常规US联合CEUS对TI-RADS 3和4甲状腺微结节的诊断性能优于常规US和CEUS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号