首页> 外文期刊>Medical Devices: Evidence and Research >Biomechanical evaluation of DTRAX? posterior cervical cage stabilization with and without lateral mass fixation
【24h】

Biomechanical evaluation of DTRAX? posterior cervical cage stabilization with and without lateral mass fixation

机译:DTRAX ?颈椎后路笼固定与不固定及侧向固定的生物力学评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation with plates or rods is the current standard procedure for posterior cervical fusion. Recently, implants placed between the facet joints have become available as an alternative to LMS or transfacet screws for patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of the DTRAX? cervical cage for single- and two-level fusion and compare this to the stability achieved with LMS fixation with rods in a two-level construct. Methods: Seven cadaveric cervical spine (C3–C7) specimens were tested in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation to ±1.5 Nm moment without preload (0 N) in the following conditions: 1) intact (C3–C7), 2) LMS and rods at C4–C5 and C5–C6, 3) removal of all rods (LMS retained) and placement of bilateral posterior cages at C5–C6, 4) bilateral posterior cages at C4–C5 and C5–C6 (without LMS and rods), and 5) C4–C5 and C5–C6 bilateral posterior cages at C4–C5 and C5–C6 with rods reinserted. Results: Bilateral posterior cervical cages significantly reduced range of motion in all tested directions in both single- and multilevel constructs ( P <0.05). Similar stability was achieved with bilateral posterior cages and LMS in a two-level construct: 0.6°±0.3° vs 1.2°±0.4° in flexion–-extension ( P =0.001), (5.0°±2.6° vs 3.1°±1.3°) in lateral bending ( P =0.053), (1.3°±1.0° vs 2.2°±0.9°) in axial rotation ( P =0.091) for posterior cages and LMS, respectively. Posterior cages, when placed as an adjunct to LMS, further reduced range of motion in a multilevel construct ( P <0.05). Conclusion: Bilateral posterior cages provide similar cervical segmental stability compared with a LMS and rod construct and may be an alternative surgical option for select patients. Furthermore, supplementation of a lateral mass construct with posterior cages increases cervical spine stability in single- and multilevel conditions.
机译:简介:用钢板或棒固定侧块螺钉(LMS)是当前颈椎后路融合术的标准方法。近来,用于颈椎神经根神经根病患者的小关节之间的植入物已成为LMS或穿钉的替代品。这项研究的目的是评估DTRAX的生物力学稳定性。 宫颈笼用于单层和两层融合,并将其与在两层结构中用棒固定LMS所获得的稳定性进行比较。方法:在以下情况下,对7具尸体颈椎(C3-C7)标本进行了屈曲-伸展,横向弯曲和无预载(0 N)的±1.5 Nm力矩的轴向旋转测试:1)完整(C3-C7), 2)C4–C5和C5–C6处的LMS和棒,3)移除所有标本(保留LMS)并在C5–C6处放置双侧后笼,4)C4–C5和C5–C6的双侧后笼(无LMS和棒),以及5)重新插入棒的C4-C5和C5-C6双侧后笼分别位于C4-C5和C5-C6。结果:单侧和多层结构的双侧后颈椎笼在所有测试方向上均显着降低了运动范围(P <0.05)。双侧后笼和LMS在两级结构中也达到了类似的稳定性:屈曲-伸展度为0.6°±0.3°vs 1.2°±0.4°(P = 0.001),(5.0°±2.6°vs 3.1°±1.3后侧笼和LMS分别在侧向弯曲(P = 0.053)中的角度(P = 0.053),在轴向旋转(P = 0.091)中(1.3°±1.0°与2.2°±0.9°)。后笼作为LMS的辅助设备放置时,在多层结构中的活动范围进一步减小(P <0.05)。结论:与LMS和杆构造相比,双侧后部笼提供类似的颈段稳定性,对于某些患者可能是另一种手术选择。此外,在侧面和侧面均采用后部笼状结构的情况下,可以增加单层和多层条件下颈椎的稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号