...
首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women

机译:系统评价和荟萃分析:孕妇快速诊断测试与胎盘组织学,显微镜和PCR的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background During pregnancy, malaria infection with Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax is related to adverse maternal health and poor birth outcomes. Diagnosis of malaria, during pregnancy, is complicated by the absence or low parasite densities in peripheral blood. Diagnostic methods, other than microscopy, are needed for detection of placental malaria. Therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), detecting antigen, and molecular techniques (PCR), detecting DNA, for the diagnosis of Plasmodium infections in pregnancy was systematically reviewed. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of RDTs, PCR, microscopy of peripheral and placental blood and placental histology for the detection of malaria infection (all species) in pregnant women. Results The results of 49 studies were analysed in metandi (Stata), of which the majority described P. falciparum infections. Although both placental and peripheral blood microscopy cannot reliably replace histology as a reference standard for placental P. falciparum infection, many studies compared RDTs and PCR to these tests. The proportion of microscopy positives in placental blood (sensitivity) detected by peripheral blood microscopy, RDTs and PCR are respectively 72% [95% CI 62-80], 81% [95% CI 55-93] and 94% [95% CI 86-98]. The proportion of placental blood microscopy negative women that were negative in peripheral blood microscopy, RDTs and PCR (specificity) are 98% [95% CI 95-99], 94% [95% CI 76-99] and 77% [95% CI 71-82]. Based on the current data, it was not possible to determine if the false positives in RDTs and PCR are caused by sequestered parasites in the placenta that are not detected by placental microscopy. Conclusion The findings suggest that RDTs and PCR may have good performance characteristics to serve as alternatives for the diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy, besides any other limitations and practical considerations concerning the use of these tests. Nevertheless, more studies with placental histology as reference test are urgently required to reliably determine the accuracy of RDTs and PCR for the diagnosis of placental malaria. P. vivax-infections have been neglected in diagnostic test accuracy studies of malaria in pregnancy.
机译:背景技术在怀孕期间,疟疾感染了恶性疟原虫或间日疟原虫,与孕产妇健康不良和分娩结果差有关。怀孕期间疟疾的诊断因外周血缺乏或寄生虫密度低而复杂化。除显微镜检查外,还需要其他诊断方法来检测胎盘疟疾。因此,系统地回顾了快速诊断测试(RDT),检测抗原和分子技术(PCR),检测DNA的诊断准确性,以诊断孕妇的疟原虫感染。方法搜寻MEDLINE,EMBASE和Web of Science进行研究,以评估RDTs的诊断准确性,PCR,外周血和胎盘血的显微镜检查以及胎盘组织学检查孕妇疟疾感染(所有物种)的准确性。结果在metandi(Stata)中分析了49项研究的结果,其中大多数描述了恶性疟原虫感染。尽管胎盘和外周血显微镜不能可靠地代替组织学作为恶性疟原虫感染的参考标准,但许多研究将RDT和PCR与这些测试进行了比较。外周血显微镜,RDT和PCR检测到的胎盘血液中显微镜阳性的比例(敏感性)分别为72%[95%CI 62-80],81%[95%CI 55-93]和94%[95%CI 86-98]。胎盘血液镜检阴性的女性在外周血镜检,RDT和PCR(特异性)检测中阴性的比例分别为98%[95%CI 95-99],94%[95%CI 76-99]和77%[95% CI 71-82]。根据当前数据,无法确定RDT和PCR中的假阳性是否由胎盘镜检未检测到的胎盘中被隔离的寄生虫引起。结论研究结果表明,RDT和PCR可能具有良好的性能特征,可作为妊娠疟疾诊断的替代方法,此外还涉及使用这些检测方法的任何其他限制和实际考虑。然而,迫切需要进行更多以胎盘组织学为参考的研究,以可靠地确定RDT和PCR的准确性,以诊断胎盘疟疾。在妊娠期疟疾的诊断测试准确性研究中,间日疟原虫感染已被忽略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号