...
首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting
【24h】

Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test CareStart pLDH Malaria (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting

机译:在参考环境中评估快速诊断测试CareStart pLDH疟疾(Pf-pLDH / pan-pLDH)以诊断疟疾

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The present study evaluated CareStart pLDH Malaria, a three-band rapid diagnostic test detecting Plasmodium falciparum-specific parasite lactate dehydrogenase (Pf-pLDH) and pan Plasmodium-specific pLDH (pan-pLDH) in a reference setting. Methods CareStart pLDH was retrospectively and prospectively assessed with a panel of stored (n?=?498) and fresh (n?=?77) blood samples obtained in international travelers suspected of malaria. Both panels comprised all four Plasmodium species; the retrospective panel comprised also Plasmodium negative samples. The reference method was microscopy corrected by PCR. The prospective panel was run side-to-side with OptiMAL (Pf-pLDH/pan-pLDH) and SDFK60 (histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP-2)/pan-pLDH). Results In the retrospective evaluation, overall sensitivity for P. falciparum samples (n?=?247) was 94.7%, reaching 98.7% for parasite densities?>?1,000/μl. Most false negative results occurred among samples with pure gametocytaemia (2/12, 16.7%) and at parasite densities?≤?100/μl (7/12, 58.3%). None of the Plasmodium negative samples (n?=?96) showed visible test lines. Sensitivities for Plasmodium vivax (n?=?70), Plasmodium ovale (n?=?69) and Plasmodium malariae (n?=?16) were 74.3%, 31.9% and 25.0% respectively. Wrong species identification occurred in 10 (2.5%) samples and was mainly due to P. vivax samples reacting with the Pf-pLDH test line. Overall, Pf-pLDH test lines showed higher line intensities compared to the pan-pLDH lines (67.9% and 23.0% medium and strong line intensities for P. falciparum). In the prospective panel (77 Plasmodium-positive samples), CareStart pLDH showed higher sensitivities for P. falciparum compared to OptiMAL (p?=?0.008), lower sensitivities for P. falciparum as compare to SDFK60 (although not reaching statistical significance, p?=?0.08) and higher sensitivities for P. ovale compared to both OptiMAL (p?=?0.03) and SDFK60 (p?=?0.01). Inter-observer and test reproducibility were good to excellent. Conclusion CareStart pLDH performed excellent for the detection of P. falciparum, well for P. vivax, but poor for P. ovale and P. malariae.
机译:背景本研究评估了CareStart pLDH疟疾,这是一种三波段快速诊断测试,在参考环境中检测恶性疟原虫特异性寄生虫乳酸脱氢酶(Pf-pLDH)和泛疟原虫特异性pLDH(pan-pLDH)。方法使用从一组怀疑患有疟疾的国际旅行者中收集的(n?=?498)和新鲜的(n?=?77)血液样本,对CareStart pLDH进行回顾性和前瞻性评估。两个小组都包括所有四个疟原虫物种。回顾性小组还包括疟原虫阴性样品。参考方法通过PCR进行显微镜校正。前瞻性小组与OptiMAL(Pf-pLDH / pan-pLDH)和SDFK60(富含组氨酸的蛋白质2(HRP-2)/ pan-pLDH)并排运行。结果在回顾性评估中,恶性疟原虫样品(n = 247)的总体敏感性为94.7%,寄生虫密度≥1,000/μl达到98.7%。假阴性结果多数发生在纯配子体细胞增多症(2 / 12,16.7%)和寄生虫密度≤100/μl(7 / 12,58.3%)的样本中。疟原虫阴性样品(n≥96)均未显示可见的测试线。间日疟原虫(n≥70),卵形疟原虫(n = 69)和疟疾疟原虫(n = 16)的敏感性分别为74.3%,31.9%和25.0%。错误的物种鉴定发生在10个(2.5%)样品中,主要是由于间日疟原虫样品与Pf-pLDH测试线反应。总体而言,与pan-pLDH品系相比,Pf-pLDH测试品系显示出更高的品系强度(恶性疟原虫的中等和强品系强度分别为67.9%和23.0%)。在前瞻性样本(77个疟原虫阳性样本)中,与OptiMAL(p?=?0.008)相比,CareStart pLDH对恶性疟原虫的敏感性更高,与SDFK60相比,对恶性疟原虫的敏感性更低(尽管未达到统计学意义,p λ= 0.08)和与OptimAL(p = 0.03)和SDFK60(p = 0.01)相比对卵圆形疟原虫的敏感性更高。观察者之间和测试的可重复性都非常好。结论CareStart pLDH在恶性疟原虫的检测中表现出色,间日疟原虫的检测效果很好,而卵形疟原虫和疟疾疟原虫的检测效果较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号