...
首页> 外文期刊>Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : >Evaluation of Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Comparison of Unenhanced 3T 3D Time-of-flight MR Angiography with Digital Subtraction Angiography
【24h】

Evaluation of Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Comparison of Unenhanced 3T 3D Time-of-flight MR Angiography with Digital Subtraction Angiography

机译:颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘的评估:未增强的3T 3D飞行时间MR血管造影与数字减影血管造影的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: We compared gross characterization of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) between unenhanced 3-tesla 3-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Methods: We subjected 26 consecutive patients with intracranial DAVF to unenhanced 3T 3D TOF MRA and to DSA. Two independent sets of observers inspected the main arterial feeders, fistula site, and venous drainage pattern on MRA and DSA images. Interobserver and intermodality agreements were assessed by k statistics. Results: Interobserver agreement was excellent for fistula site (κ = 0.919; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.805 to 1.000), good for main arterial feeders (κ = 0.711; 95% CI, 0.483 to 0.984), and very good for venous drainage (κ = 0.900; 95% CI, 0.766 to 1.000). Intermodality agreement was excellent for fistula site (κ = 0.968; 95% CI, 0.906 to 1.000) and good for main arterial feeder (κ = 0.809; 95% CI, 0.598 to 1.000) and venous drainage (κ = 0.837; 95% CI, 0.660 to 1.000). Conclusion: Gross characterization of intracranial DAVF was similar for both imaging modalities, but unenhanced 3T 3D TOF MRA cannot replace DSA.
机译:目的:我们比较了未增强的3特斯拉3维(3D)飞行时间(TOF)磁共振血管造影(MRA)和数字减影血管造影(DSA)之间的颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘(DAVF)的总体特征。方法:我们连续26例颅内DAVF患者接受了未增强的3T 3D TOF MRA和DSA。两组独立的观察员检查了MRA和DSA图像上的主要动脉供血器,瘘管部位和静脉引流模式。观察者间和多式联运协议通过k统计量进行评估。结果:观察者间的一致性对瘘管部位(κ= 0.919; 95%置信区间[CI],0.805至1.000)极好,对主要动脉支线(κ= 0.711; 95%CI,0.483至0.984)好,对静脉引流(κ= 0.900; 95%CI,0.766至1.000)。多式联运协议对瘘部位(κ= 0.968; 95%CI,0.906至1.000)极好,对主要动脉支线(κ= 0.809; 95%CI,0.598至1.000)和静脉引流(κ= 0.837; 95%CI)良好,从0.660到1.000)。结论:两种成像方式的颅内DAVF的总体特征相似,但未增强的3T 3D TOF MRA不能替代DSA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号