首页> 外文期刊>ERJ Open Research >The impact of different spirometric definitions on the prevalence of airway obstruction and their association with respiratory symptoms
【24h】

The impact of different spirometric definitions on the prevalence of airway obstruction and their association with respiratory symptoms

机译:不同的肺功能测定法定义对气道阻塞的发生率及其与呼吸道症状的关系

获取原文
           

摘要

The fixed ratio criterion of forced expiratory volume in 1?s/forced vital capacity 0.70 for diagnosing airway obstruction may overdiagnose the condition, particularly in the elderly, so the lower limit of normal (LLN) is recommended as the most appropriate criterion. Our aim was to compare LLN versus fixed ratio on the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and examine the association between respiratory symptoms and airway obstruction defined by LLN and fixed ratio.12?449 twins aged 40–80?years participated in a nationwide survey using the Danish Twin Registry. They completed a questionnaire, underwent clinical examination and recorded prebronchodilator spirometry. Individuals with self-reported asthma were excluded. Clinical COPD was defined by respiratory symptoms together with airway obstruction.10?329 individuals were included, with a mean±sd age of 58.4±9.6?years and mean body mass index of 26.6±4.4?kg·m?2; 20% were current smokers, 37% former smokers and 43% never-smokers; and 48% were male. The prevalence of LLN airway obstruction (LLN-AO) and fixed ratio airway obstruction (FR-AO) was 5.6% and 18.0%, respectively (p0.001). Overall, 26% reported current respiratory symptoms, but 50% of those with LLN-AO had respiratory symptoms compared to 39% with FR-AO, p0.001. The prevalence of clinical LLN-COPD and fixed ratio COPD was 2.6% and 6.3%, respectively (p0.001). Individuals with LLN-AO had a significantly higher probability of reporting respiratory symptoms compared with both healthy individuals and FR-AO when adjusted for sex, age and ever-smoking.The use of fixed ratio more than doubled the prevalence of clinical COPD compared with LLN, this being more pronounced with increased age, and identified subjects with a lower prevalence of respiratory symptoms than LLN-AO.Prevalence of airway obstruction in a nationwide twin population http://ow.ly/x4QR30g1rId
机译:诊断气道阻塞的强制呼气量固定比率标准(1?s /强制肺活量<0.70)可能会过度诊断该病,尤其是对于老年人,因此建议将下限(LLN)作为最合适的标准。我们的目的是比较LLN和固定比率对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患病率的影响,并检查LLN和固定比率所定义的呼吸道症状与气道阻塞之间的关系。12?449岁40-80?岁的双胞胎参加了这项研究。使用丹麦双胞胎注册中心进行的全国性调查。他们填写了调查表,接受了临床检查并记录了支气管扩张剂前肺活量测定。自我报告的哮喘患者被排除在外。临床COPD由呼吸道症状和气道阻塞定义。包括10到329个人,平均±标准年龄为58.4±9.6岁,平均体重指数为26.6±4.4?kg·m?2。当前吸烟者占20%,以前吸烟者占37%,从不吸烟者占43%;男性占48%。 LLN气道阻塞(LLN-AO)和固定比率气道阻塞(FR-AO)的患病率分别为5.6%和18.0%(p <0.001)。总体而言,有26%的人报告了当前的呼吸道症状,但LLN-AO的人中有50%有呼吸道症状,而FR-AO的人为39%,p <0.001。临床LLN-COPD和固定比率COPD的患病率分别为2.6%和6.3%(p <0.001)。调整了性别,年龄和吸烟后,与健康个体和FR-AO相比,LLN-AO个体报告呼吸道症状的可能性明显更高。与LLN相比,固定比例的使用使临床COPD的患病率增加了一倍以上,这种现象随着年龄的增长而变得更加明显,并且确定了比LLN-AO患呼吸道疾病的患病率低。全国双胞胎人群中气道阻塞的患病率

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号