首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >A methodological systematic review of early versus late stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures
【24h】

A methodological systematic review of early versus late stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures

机译:胸腰椎骨折早期和晚期稳定的方法学系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveThe optimal timing of stabilization in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures remains controversial. There is currently a lack of consensus on the timing of surgical stabilization, which is limited by the reality that a randomized controlled trial to evaluate early versus late stabilization is difficult to perform. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the benefits, safety and costs of early stabilization compared with late stabilization using data available in the current literature.MethodsAn electronic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies evaluating the timing of surgery in patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Two reviewers independently analyzed and selected each study on the basis of the eligibility criteria. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system (GRADE). Any disagreements were resolved by consensus.ResultsTen studies involving 2,512 subjects were identified. These studies demonstrated that early stabilization shortened the hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days and reduced morbidity and hospital expenses for patients with thoracic fractures. However, reduced morbidity and hospital expenses were not observed with stabilization of lumbar fractures. Owing to the very low level of evidence, no conclusion could be made regarding the effect of early stabilization on mortality.ConclusionsWe could adhere to the recommendation that patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures should undergo early stabilization, which may reduce the hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, morbidity and hospital expenses, particularly when the thoracic spine is involved. Individual patient characteristics should be concerned carefully. However, the definite conclusion cannot be made due to the heterogeneity of the included studies and low level of evidence. Further prospective studies are required to confirm whether there are benefits to early stabilization compared with late stabilization...
机译:目的外伤性胸腰椎骨折患者的最佳稳定时机仍然存在争议。当前,关于手术稳定时间的选择尚缺乏共识,这受以下事实的局限:难以评估早期稳定与晚期稳定的随机对照试验。因此,本研究的目的是使用现有文献中的数据确定早期稳定与晚期稳定相比的益处,安全性和成本。方法在Medline,Embase,Cochrane系统评价数据库和Cochrane中进行电子文献搜索对照试验中央登记册,用于评估胸腰椎骨折患者手术时机的相关研究。两名审查者根据资格标准独立分析并选择了每个研究。使用推荐评估,发展和评估系统分级(GRADE)对纳入研究的质量进行评估。结果鉴定出涉及2,512名受试者的十项研究。这些研究表明,早期稳定可以缩短医院的住院时间,重症监护病房的住院时间,呼吸机天数,并减少胸骨骨折患者的发病率和住院费用。然而,腰椎骨折的稳定并未导致发病率和住院费用的降低。由于证据水平非常低,因此无法就早期稳定对死亡率的影响得出任何结论。结论我们可以坚持建议创伤性胸腰椎骨折患者应进行早期稳定,这可能会缩短住院时间,增加强度护理单位的住院时间,呼吸机天数,发病率和住院费用,尤其是在涉及胸椎的情况下。应当仔细考虑患者的个人特征。但是,由于所纳入研究的异质性和证据水平较低,因此无法得出明确的结论。需要进一步的前瞻性研究,以确认与后期稳定相比,早期稳定是否有益处...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号